Ben 'Burbo' Trbojevic

He is really good in the centres
Sure I was shiiting myself with the injury toll. But when Ben T went to centre I was cheering. Then he scores. His one on one defence is great. He doesn’t run in blindly leaving the winger with no option but to follow.

Seibs can’t and won’t put him there with a full complement of centres. But if either of them are out, BenT to the rescue.
 
Are you sure? Fk that. I thought all the players would be pawing thru Silvertails in their recovery/vid sessions. Surely it’s Seibs first stop after the presser. @:D

I see Turbo was on here the other day. He went straight to seibs and said am I coming back as a centre ? 😂
 
Burbo does some good things, and has upside in him.

I was mightily disappointed with him last night though, especially that first half.

Those dropped balls in good attacking areas just killed us, at the time, after all the defence we had done.

He had a golden opportunity to step up in a leadership role, and simply didn't.
 
Sadly we couldn't match the 500k that Wests were offering.

chose not to match the money.

Despite spending years doing the development, on all of them.

It seems to be a bit of a recurring theme at the moment.
 
Sadly we couldn't match the 500k that Wests were offering.
Exactly , it’s a pity as we well and truly supported the Fainu’s and brought them through the system BUT at the end of the day big $$$$ proved more enticing.

It’s just a pity that people on here don’t quite get how the salary cap works.

You must have 30 players , and you have to allow for bringing players up from reserves when you have injuries ( and that needs to be included in the cap ).

We have quite a few very expensive players , and a lot on fairly big money , so when you take those into account and you still need another 20 players you just cannot afford superstars or potential superstars who want superstar money.
 
Exactly , it’s a pity as we well and truly supported the Fainu’s and brought them through the system BUT at the end of the day big $$$$ proved more enticing.

It’s just a pity that people on here don’t quite get how the salary cap works.

You must have 30 players , and you have to allow for bringing players up from reserves when you have injuries ( and that needs to be included in the cap ).

We have quite a few very expensive players , and a lot on fairly big money , so when you take those into account and you still need another 20 players you just cannot afford superstars or potential superstars who want superstar money.

Sure, but we still made a choice to release these guys.

Yes, a choice.
 
Exactly , it’s a pity as we well and truly supported the Fainu’s and brought them through the system BUT at the end of the day big $$$$ proved more enticing.

It’s just a pity that people on here don’t quite get how the salary cap works.

You must have 30 players , and you have to allow for bringing players up from reserves when you have injuries ( and that needs to be included in the cap ).

We have quite a few very expensive players , and a lot on fairly big money , so when you take those into account and you still need another 20 players you just cannot afford superstars or potential superstars who want superstar money.
Everybody knows how the salary cap works. The club could of matched it if they wanted too and reshuffled in other areas. I mean we did bring in 4 or 5 players over the off season. It seems at times the only people who don't know how the salary cap works are the club. Paying massive and long contracts to players that continue to Hamstring the very thing we are talking about. And not one of them has offered up their value in said contracts. And don't get me started on the Schuster saga.. the means for samuela to stay were definitely there. Salary cap working and all. Now I'm not saying he should of been given a lifetime contract (which seems to be the norm at manly) but we sure as hell could of done with him this year at least. ( which he was contracted for as well I might add).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
2 2 0 44 6
3 3 0 32 6
3 2 1 38 4
3 2 1 36 4
3 2 1 36 4
3 2 1 33 4
3 2 1 6 4
2 1 1 4 4
3 2 1 4 4
3 2 1 -4 4
3 2 1 -12 4
3 1 2 -6 2
2 0 2 -9 2
3 1 2 -38 2
3 0 3 -28 0
3 0 3 -64 0
3 0 3 -72 0
Back
Top Bottom