40 years an eagle
Bencher
I see the logic in that mate but the REALITY is that a spot on the bench taken up by "a utility" has amounted to VERY FEW game time minutes in every game throughout the season.I see him being used in the case of a mid-game injury. Who would replace Api at hooker or DCE/Croker at half/five-eighth? I don't see him being brought on to change the course of a match.
Can you name another versatile option in our roster?
Playmaker injuries that can't be handled by an on-field reshuffle are very few and far between and that's why some of the starting 13 train in different positions as well as their own.
I would rather get 40 minutes out of a hard-running, hard-defending backrower( which will rest 2 starting forwards for 20 minutes each) EVERY WEEK!
Getting 5-10-20 minutes a game from a bench utility is wasting 20-40 minutes of needed hard work every game because of the needless fear of losing a playmaker.
We will win more than half of our games and probably be leading on the scoreboard at the time if a playmaker injury occurs.
We will always have a better chance of holding onto the scoreboard with a fresh/ish backrower and a reshuffle that we trained for than bringing on a utility.