backloading contracts

Shoe1

Journey Man
It's reasonable to assume that backloaded contracts are the reason why Manly is tight under the cap for 2011. Guys like G Stewart, Kite, Watmough etc who re-signed in the last 2 years would have had to have smaller payments in the 1st year or so, and bigger ones in later years, as Manly was still paying Orford's (and others) backloaded contracts last year.

That would explain why the Farrer option of 1 year in France is necessary.

I don't credit the rumours that Manly has $$ worries, it's the reality of having to manage and stack a quality team that is capable of winning a premiership.
 
having a quite year as far as recuitment goes and forward loading some contracts, then having a big recuitment year and backloading the new contracts seems to be the legal way tinker with the cap.
 
The problem with that is you maybe have 2 or 3 years tops to get the premiership while you have a top quality roster, then after that you need to release a few players to keep under the cap and start again in a few years time. We managed to get our premiership, but it looks like it has come at a cost for the next few years.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 19 16 0 3 158 36
2 Bulldogs 18 14 0 4 136 34
3 Storm 18 13 0 5 222 32
4 Warriors 18 12 0 6 28 30
5 Panthers 18 10 1 7 79 27
6 Broncos 18 10 0 8 78 26
7 Sharks 19 11 0 8 23 26
8 Dolphins 18 9 0 9 169 24
9 Sea Eagles 18 9 0 9 22 24
10 Roosters 18 8 0 10 4 22
11 Cowboys 19 7 1 11 -157 19
12 Dragons 18 6 0 12 -64 18
13 Tigers 19 7 0 12 -135 18
14 Eels 18 6 0 12 -147 18
15 Knights 19 6 0 13 -116 16
16 Titans 18 5 0 13 -149 16
17 Rabbitohs 19 6 0 13 -151 16
Back
Top Bottom