Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

DUFFMAN

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
1,500
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

The NRL and clubs are having a meeting next tuesday to discuss raising the salary cap, but 8 clubs are against raising it, making it unlikly to be increased.


For...............................................Against

Brisbane..........................................Parramatta
Newcastle.......................... .............Cronulla
Melbourne.......................................Canberra
Cowboys.........................................Manly
New Zealand.............................. .....Dragons
Penrith..................................... .......Bulldogs
Roosters.........................................West Tigers
......................................................Souths
 

Berkeley_Eagle

Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
16,037
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

and why werent the Titans asked as well
 

Berkeley_Eagle

Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
16,037
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

By Dean Ritchie
March 23, 2006

A MAJORITY of NRL clubs fear they cannot afford a salary cap increase and are preparing to fight the move to lift the cap to more than $3.5 million.

The NRL has called a meeting of chief executives for next Tuesday to discuss lifting the cap - but fierce opposition to the move is now certain.

Eight clubs are opposed to the cap increase, citing the NSW Government's poker machine tax hike affecting grants to football clubs as the key reason for their stance. Seven clubs want a rise.

NRL chief executive David Gallop described a rise in the cap, which is now $3.36 million, as "inevitable".

Gallop has suggested players should receive additional cash through the NRL's $400m television deal.

"It's inevitable there will be some increase," Gallop said.

"But it's a matter of what the clubs and the rest of the game can afford.

"We are conscious the players need a bigger share of the pie. Clubs are employers of players and their ability to afford a cap increase will be a huge factor taken into account."

Steve Gillis, president of the Player Managers' Executive, called for a significant increase. "Rugby union has a chuckle every time it wants to poach a league player because the NRL offers zero resistance and it's an easy exercise for them," Gillis said.

"The cap should go up because our best players are grossly underpaid. The salary cap should be nearing $5 million with superannuation outside that as well."

The Daily Telegraph contacted all 15 clubs with Brisbane, Newcastle, Melbourne, North Queensland, Sydney Roosters, Penrith and the Warriors in favour of an increase while Parramatta, Cronulla, Canberra, Manly, St George Illawarra, Bulldogs, Wests Tigers and Souths are against.

Those against claim the game cannot financially sustain a salary cap increase with Parramatta chief executive Denis Fitzgerald believing the poker machine tax could shut down leagues clubs.

"A number of leagues clubs won't be able to continue with this draconian tax being inflicted upon us," Fitzgerald said. "If leagues clubs go broke, there will be no money for NRL clubs or juniors."

Sources claim the poker machine tax will, by 2011, have drained about $20m out of rugby league.

"My gut feeling is that we can't afford for the cap to go up at this stage," said Souths CEO Shane Richardson.

Dragons chief executive Peter Doust added: "In principle we can't afford an increase."

Bulldogs chief executive Malcolm Noad said: "We are happy where it is. There's only so much we can afford. Manly CEO Pat Wilson agreed, saying: "We are against an increase. It's about the game's capacity to afford it."

Wests Tigers CEO Steve Noyce said: "The threat of the poker machine tax is a real concern to us."

Tuesday's meeting will be followed by a second meeting on Wednesday between the NRL and RLPA where the cap will be discussed as part of negotiations over the Collective Bargaining Agreement.

Among the supporting clubs, Broncos chief executive Bruno Cullen said: "We're not against a rise - we can afford to pay it."

Newcastle CEO Ken Conway, said: "My personal view is it's time for an increase. There is more money coming into the game and I think the clubs and players are entitled to a share of it."

Roosters boss Brian Canavan said: "We need to progress. We need to attract and retain high-profile players."
 

byso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,621
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

If Manly want Lyons. You would think an increase would be required.
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

Interesting geographical split on the "for" and "against".
 

Garts

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2005
Messages
5,621
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

was Manly recently quoated as saying the cap needs to rise so they can keep Menzies and Kennedy beyond this season?
 

Ryan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
18,921
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

It's about "the STATES" poker machine tax lads....hence most Sydney Teams upposed.
 

Matabele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,083
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

A lot of Canberra's money comes from Quenbeyan Leagues Club which is also in NSW.

However, the real problem for the Raiders is they're losing the war for the hearts and minds of the highly educated Canberra demographic. The Brumbies are slowly throttling them.

The only Sydney clubs in favour are Panthers with their empire of Leagues clubs and Roosters with their connections to the top end of town - connections that we once boasted of.

Thanks Zorb.
 

Spuds Bodyguard

Active Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
682
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

Wouldn't the cap increase co-incide with a bigger grant from the NRL to clubs?
 

The Gronk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
3,473
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

Wouldn't the cap increase co-incide with a bigger grant from the NRL to clubs?
Yeah the article mentions the clubs getting a bigger slice of the TV rights money.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,146
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

I think it should go up but no more than the increase in NRL grant money
 

Ryan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
18,921
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

Guys - it would be on a "in principle" basis. The Leagues club that supplies the Football club cash on a regular basis is being screwed by the poker machine tax. If all the clubs stick to their guns, and refuse an increase on this basis, the negative media the state government would get may sway the changes needed in order for this unfair tax to be reviewed.

Therefore, it's in the fans of The Sea Eagles interests to support the rejection of the increase in salary cap. If the tax is reviewed and reduced, the Leagues club could afford to pay the Footy Club more, ensuring we attain additional blue chip players and providing additional cash flow going forward which would stabilise the clubs financial viability into future years.

Sorry if that was a tad political.
 

Fluffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,146
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

Could afford - maybe

would cough up the money - unlikely
 

Stuey Davis Socks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
1,797
8 clubs....."we cant afford salary cap increase"

The only Sydney clubs in favour are Panthers with their empire of Leagues clubs
It is interesting that Penrith are supporting the move as the empire is actually a bit shaky at the moment. I have read that the Leagues Club is looking at selling a load of "non-core" assets.
 

Latest posts

2020 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Panthers 20 18 1 1 299 37
2 Storm 20 16 0 4 258 32
3 Eels 20 15 0 5 104 30
4 Roosters 20 14 0 6 230 28
5 Raiders 20 14 0 6 128 28
6 Rabbitohs 20 12 0 8 169 24
7 Knights 20 11 1 8 47 23
8 Sharks 20 10 0 10 0 20
9 Titans 20 9 0 11 -117 18
10 Warriors 20 8 0 12 -115 16
11 Tigers 20 7 0 13 -65 14
12 Dragons 20 7 0 13 -74 14
13 Sea Eagles 20 7 0 13 -134 14
14 Cowboys 20 5 0 15 -152 10
15 Bulldogs 20 3 0 17 -222 6
16 Broncos 20 3 0 17 -356 6
Top Bottom