Well we can’t blame Seibold for that.I think any chance we've had over the last 5 years to really challenge went out the door when we lost Api, Manase and Schu. 3 players of enormous talent , which we've not managed to replace and capable of taking a team to a premiership.
Api , who was to know that Stabby McStabby was going to **** the bed , the choice at the time , the right one.I think any chance we've had over the last 5 years to really challenge went out the door when we lost Api, Manase and Schu. 3 players of enormous talent , which we've not managed to replace and capable of taking a team to a premiership.
The Jail bird was no coaches faultWell we can’t blame Seibold for that.
… and talent is no good if you are in jail. Surely we gave shu enough opportunities, but for whatever reason he kept putting on the kg?
Api … well wasn’t that Des fault
Just sayin’
More than Bennett over Seibold, if schu does come good, I think it could be from the psychology of a fresh start.The Jail bird was no coaches fault
The Api number 9 was Because both coaches persisted with the predictable and pedestrian Brave tackling bag Instead of finding a more comprehensive and dominant 9 .
The shu was given opportunities but players playing to their ability is not only about opportunities
It is also all about being motivated to get the job done
If Bennet the man who has ability to get players playing to the best of the ability gets the best out of the Shu then he will have exposed the incapability's of the Shus previous coaches
Unpopular opinion but I don’t think Schuster has the potential to be a star, even if he gets the mental side together. He hasn’t grown into an athlete. He is genetically incapable of being a fine athlete. People think fitness and athleticism is desire and hard training but there’s so much more to it. Genetics play a huge role in aerobic capacity and Schu has a really poor engine. Further, he does not have the fast twitch explosiveness required to be a running threat. He was one of those kids with silky ball skills and a bit of size that tear up the juniors but he’ll always struggle to have an impact at NRL level. His ‘caution to the wind’ ball playing is also only conducive to highlight reels on ‘flat tracks’ and will not stand up against quality defence in big games; that same strength becomes a liability.More than Bennett over Seibold, if schu does come good, I think it could be from the psychology of a fresh start.
I agree with @Disco that on balance our replacements for losses out of the 2024 squad, and the supplementary list, have more upside than the players that have moved on. I have Patolo as almost a direct swap for Woods, with Tevaga taking Schusters slot. The others are pretty well self-explanatory with Hopoate and Schoupp already taking Hodgson and Parkers slots mid-season 2024. Assuming Bateman and Pua'Avase both come into the thirty, does that still leave us two spots to fill before the June cutoff in 2025?The way I see it.
Jazz, Taukeuahio and Chee Kam replace Woods, Lodge and Condon in the squad....those 3 played 10 games between them last year (5 off the bench, a total of 321 minutes) so I'm not too stressed....in fact I think we'll get better value from the 3 coming in.
I do expect 1 more in to replace Lawton (most likely Bateman).
A fantasy would be May on top but I think I may as well be hoping for Powerball next Thurs.
Check back in just after Xmas.Is Bateman happening?? I suppose May is off the table
They don't have a Top 30 spot free next year without someone leaving. Could basically confirm it now.Looks like it’s May to the Tigers
So the Bateman to us is firming
They punted young Jordan Miller who has two years remaining on his deal, was an article a couple of weeks ago that he is disputing the sacking via unfair dismissal.They don't have a Top 30 spot free next year without someone leaving. Could basically confirm it now.
Sydney club has sounded out mbye in a potential return to the NRL. Has to be us surely. Only we would do something like that. Especially after missing out on volkman and boyd
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |