look I agree but by that same logic Melbourne will beat Penrith if they do the exact same. Penrith are a team of their halves, with Crichton / Naden / To'o flowing off the back of them. The threat with the storm is their ability to score from anywhere - kicking to wings & centres, backrowers or props goign through gaping holes made by smith / munster, hughes running the ball.
Another point to refute is 'Raiders being dead before the ball was kicked' - they showed extreme energy until the end but Storm came out with the perfect game plan - if you out enthuse the raiders, beating them with energy, they cannot game manage themselves back into momentum. Wighton is a great player but by no means a game managers, same with Williams. Still, think Raiders are pushover. Eels, yeah they sucked come the end.
Another point is the grind - a wet track plays into the Storms hands more than anyone. The 6 again rule is great but the game still has the wrestle and no team has perfected it more than the Storm. Not only that, but the winners of a grind are often the best game managers and a forwards battle. Forwards are tough but I would give the storm an edge on size and bench impact. Game management is another question: Cleary has been the best player of the year... but can he do it himself? A lot of Penrith's attack has been off flair, not game management. Luai flicking the ball out the back, the classic penrith attack. Smith is the best game manager in the competition and I would say a grind swings the way just of Storm.
I guess we shall see. As an NRL fan would be great to see Penrith win, but I just think the Storm are the perfect package at the moment. Penrith have no big game experience, except the handful of origin matches Cleary has packed into his bag, compared to Smith (how many tests/finals/origins?), munster, and even their test players - hughes, NAS, smith, bromwich x2, kaufusi, addo-car have all played international footy.
Can't wait to see the game. Will be interesting to see what happens.