Van Nguyen
- Thread starter Cameron
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
-
We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
Yes substance abuse in copius amount are never going to be good for you.
Remember he was an alcoholic, Harry addict (and I dont mean potter) and put every other kind of drug you can imagine through his body several times a day.
his shakes more than likely come from the alcohol though. Ever seen "leaving las vegas"?
Matabele
Journey Man
correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.
The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]
No - your pre-supposition is that the onus of proof is not on you.
My pre-supposition is the opposite.
Whose pre-supposition is correct?
Byso - I suggest Dan is arguing from his own personal experience which is a fairly small minded and narrow view - regardless of how many countries have been graced with his presence.
Suggest you just treat it with the contempt it deserves.
Utility Player
Bencher
correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.
The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]
This is getting to sound a bit like another thread on this page hope it has the legs of the original :lol:
correct, but the onus of proof is not on me.
The lack of proof of a link is proof enough at this stage because the onus of proof lies on the party making the claim of a link!
[/quote]
No - your pre-supposition is that the onus of proof is not on you.
My pre-supposition is the opposite.
Whose pre-supposition is correct?
Byso - I suggest Dan is arguing from his own personal experience which is a fairly small minded and narrow view - regardless of how many countries have been graced with his presence.
Suggest you just treat it with the contempt it deserves.
[/quote]
lol if you are debating from your own personal view then your argument is as equally narrow minded.
Matabele
Journey Man
No I'm debating the opinion of an expert in the field who has thoroughly reviewed my case over a period of some years.
Do you know what a PhD is?
If Byso is an idiot (or whatever else it is you're calling him) then you're an arrogant young twat who has a lot to learn in life.
Do you know what a PhD is?
If Byso is an idiot (or whatever else it is you're calling him) then you're an arrogant young twat who has a lot to learn in life.
none on yourself. But if you have studies I would be ahppy to read them and be proven wrong. That is fine, but from the research i have done i can not find anything that would convince me of the link.
There is a lot of tabloid medicine out there fuelled by trash like ACA and the Telegraph
There is a lot of tabloid medicine out there fuelled by trash like ACA and the Telegraph
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
10 | 9 | 1 | 124 | 20 |
|
10 | 8 | 2 | 81 | 18 |
|
10 | 7 | 3 | 70 | 16 |
|
10 | 7 | 3 | 69 | 16 |
|
11 | 7 | 4 | 59 | 14 |
|
10 | 6 | 4 | -10 | 14 |
|
11 | 6 | 5 | 107 | 12 |
|
11 | 6 | 5 | -9 | 12 |
|
10 | 5 | 5 | -56 | 12 |
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 30 | 11 |
|
10 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 10 |
|
11 | 5 | 6 | -12 | 10 |
|
11 | 4 | 6 | -7 | 9 |
|
10 | 3 | 7 | -103 | 8 |
|
10 | 2 | 8 | -81 | 6 |
|
10 | 2 | 8 | -91 | 6 |
|
10 | 1 | 9 | -186 | 4 |
