Rex
Bencher
Is that your attempt to demonstrate intolerance or hypocrisy in action? Or both?It's so hypocritical that those who demand tolerance and acceptance of a particular viewpoint are so intolerant of those that aren't!!
Last edited:
Is that your attempt to demonstrate intolerance or hypocrisy in action? Or both?It's so hypocritical that those who demand tolerance and acceptance of a particular viewpoint are so intolerant of those that aren't!!
It's so hypocritical that those who demand tolerance and acceptance of a particular viewpoint are so intolerant of those that aren't!!
At last-there it is! Your sole agenda was to out homophobes. Because you are a nuisance and an agitator.This is becoming quite a productive exercise in outing the homophobes. Put a little bait out there - and they bite in droves.
You have clear problems with your "inner feelings" Womby. It's like anyone talking here about - or even hinting they're going to talk about - emotions drives you into reactive postings about PC, cum bah ya, etc, etc. And then you lecture about tolerance and acceptance and shrinks.Rex, seriously...stop being a knobhead champ. We know you are articulate, but you are everything that people hate, a ****ing smart arse! Take a month off posting here and go to a shrink
At last-there it is! Your sole agenda was to out homophobes. Because you are a nuisance and an agitator.
You jump to conclusions about sole agendas. Why? because it suits your sole agenda?At last-there it is! Your sole agenda was to out homophobes. Because you are a nuisance and an agitator.
That reminds me of the book Martina Navratilova wrote in the 80s " how I used to lick all those @&$&s at Wimbledon"WHAT a bunch of sexists you lot are. Not many out, very few top sportspeople proclaim themselves gay. Balderdash!
A large number of our top female athletes are openly gay.
In fact the recent womens soccer world cup had a whole, officially approved website listing and profiling the gay players.
What was said?Paul Vautins commentary and insinuation just then explains why this article remains current
It was the pseudo homosexual voice he used after a minor infringementWhat was said?
Thanks was watching Fox sportsWhat was said?
Is that your attempt to demonstrate intolerance or hypocrisy in action? Or both?
You appear to have clear prejudgements about homosexuals highlandeagle. This shouts loudly in your postings and in your ratings of other postings. Yours would be a traditional view. That is a view I am seeking to disrupt and challenge.You should know, read back over some of your diatribes and you'll find your answer.
Fair enough. So is it ok if I say I tolerate coloured people but I want them to go about their business without getting in my way. So there should be no chinatown etc? Almost the same thing.
Drawing a long bow there,typical of the intolerant that demand tolerance
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
13 | 10 | 3 | 97 | 24 | |
14 | 10 | 4 | 78 | 22 | |
13 | 9 | 4 | 110 | 20 | |
13 | 8 | 5 | 66 | 20 | |
14 | 8 | 6 | 143 | 18 | |
13 | 7 | 6 | 81 | 18 | |
13 | 7 | 6 | -55 | 18 | |
14 | 7 | 7 | 37 | 16 | |
15 | 8 | 7 | -8 | 16 | |
13 | 7 | 6 | -34 | 16 | |
13 | 6 | 6 | 26 | 15 | |
14 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 15 | |
13 | 6 | 7 | -47 | 14 | |
13 | 4 | 9 | -126 | 12 | |
14 | 4 | 10 | -121 | 10 | |
13 | 3 | 10 | -129 | 10 | |
13 | 3 | 10 | -131 | 10 |