Fair enough...I think that they (CEC) give quite a lot of food for thought compared to the ramblings of political opponents like the ALA and one Nation. I do not agree with their entire view of things, but then again, I don't agree with the entire views of any one political party. They take a much deeper look into the woes of the world and a certainly not afraid to try to expose their findings to the masses.
Lets take a look at the terrorist threat that is current news. In the western world it is not really investigated by the average Joe. The bloke on the street will tell you Muslim's are evil and there belief systems are anti women and vile in nature. Is that because the average Joe has completely immersed himself in Muslim culture and witnessed this "wicked" religion first hand? Is he just comparing his own belief/religion with a strange one and assuming it's wrong, because it is different? Or, is it because that's what we are being fed by the media? We all know it is the radicals that are the threat, but I found this investigation and publication by the CEC interesting.
I'm sorry for the way this cut and paste turned out. I got it from a PDF. It's a little hard to read but please bear with it, or go to the link. Other interesting articles include why we should join BRICS. Give it a look if you have time...
http://cecaust.com.au/pubs/pdfs/cv8n2_web.pdf
Terrorism: Asymmetric Warfare
Another form of warfare
developed under the British
Monarchy, Steinberg
(EIR Counterintelligence Editor
Jeffrey Steinberg) said, is
asymmetric warfare, such as
terrorism, fomented as an assault
on nation-states. He highlighted
the British-Saudi alliance, with
its long history since the days of
the British East India Company in
the 18th century, and continuing
still today. “Right now”, he said,
“we’re dealing with a British
strategy for the entire greater
Middle East, Southwest Asia,
Persian Gulf, and North Africa
region, to create a new Hundred
Years’ War, a population war
within the Islamic world, pitting
Sunnis against Shiites, Arabs
against Persians”.
Steinberg reported on the
fight against these policies
within the United States, such
as the drive to declassify the
suppressed 28 pages of the
Joint Congressional Inquiry into
9/11, exposing the Saudi role—
particularly that of former Saudi
Ambassador to the USA and
long-time intelligence figure
Prince Bandar bin Sultan—in
preparing and supporting the
hijackers who carried out the 11
September 2001 attacks. “The
issue is not just the role of the
Saudi Monarchy in sponsoring
global Sunni jihadist terrorism”,
said Steinberg. “Those 28
pages open up the aperture
for not just the Saudi role, but
the British role”, because of
Bandar’s role as architect, along
with Margaret Thatcher, of the
British/Saudi weapons deal
called Al-Yamamah.” Under this
barter arrangement, the British
company BAE Systems provided
upwards of $40 billion in military
equipment to the Saudi armed
forces and an additional $20
billion in bribes to Saudi princes,
with huge cash profi t from the
deals going into an offshore slush
fund to “fi ght communism”—
including through the 1980s
Afghanistan mujahedin project,
which gave rise to much of the
modern jihadist movement.
CEC researcher Glen
Isherwood concluded the panel
with an explosive report on “Who
is Sponsoring International
terrorism?”, focussed on the
role of Britain’s Prince Charles as
an intimate of Bandar and other
Saudi fi gures linked to 9/11 and
the terrorism wave spread by the
Islamic State. He began by citing
a 23 September 2014 CEC
press release, which warned that
“a near-term terrorist attack upon
Australian soil is almost guaranteed”.
On 15 December 2014 the
“Sydney Siege” erupted on cue,
in which three people were killed
and four wounded. We knew that
such an event would happen, he
explained, because the certainty
of a new Global Financial Crisis
called into question the very
existence of the British Empire,
and the Crown would deploy
its intelligence agencies to create
mayhem in order to preserve
its power.
Addressing the widespread
belief that the Empire no longer
exists, Isherwood explained
that it is now self-described as
an “informal fi nancial empire”,
which, through “fi nancial conditionality”,
radical “green” policies,
and provoked wars and terrorism,
is committing genocide
on the scale of the mass famines
it created in India and Ireland in
the 19th century, or worse. The
documented personal role of
the Queen in sacking Australian
Prime Minister Gough Whitlam
in 1975, because he was committed
to national sovereignty
and economic development, is
another example of the Crown’s
continuing power.
Perhaps the most shocking of
all is the deep involvement of
Prince Charles in sponsoring and
protecting international terrorism,
which Isherwood explained
in detail, zeroing in on the board
of Charles’s Oxford Centre for
Islamic Studies, which is packed
with such leading fi nanciers and
sponsors of terrorism as Princes
Bandar bin Sultan and Turki
bin Faisal, both of them named
in lawsuits by 9/11 families as
orchestrators of those atrocities.
Isherwood concluded with the
case of the infamous Abu Hamza
Al Masri, who as preacher at
the Finsbury Mosque in London
for several years beginning
in 1997 directed the training and
dispatch of hundreds of terrorists,
worldwide and within the
UK. In the 7 July 2005 London
Subway bombings by his disciples,
known as “7/7”, 52 people
were killed and 700 wounded.
While preparing such attacks,
Isherwood demonstrated, Hamza
was under the protection of Britain’s
MI5 and MI6 on behalf of
the Crown. The danger will escalate,
including with more attacks
in Britain itself, until the dirty apparatus
behind them is fully exposed
and rooted out.
History and Philosophy of the Citizens Electoral Council
CEC Australia is a national political party, established in 1988 in Queensland.
In the early 1990s, the CEC became closely associated with the LaRouche organisation in the U.S.A. Our collaboration with Mr. LaRouche and his cothinkers worldwide, is based on achieving peace through economic development, both for Australia, and for all regions of the world.
In 1990, the CEC developed an economic programme for the reconstruction of our nation entitled
Sovereign Australia, and in 1994 published
Sovereign Australia II—A Legislative Programme to Save our Nation, which latter contained drafts of the necessary legislation for economic reconstruction, including debt moratoria for farmers and the re-establishment of a national bank, among other key elements; these programmes and legislation are far more urgently needed now, than when they were written.
By far the most pressing issue of our times, both for Australia and for the world, is the accelerating onset of a new Great Depression, one which was caused by the insane policies of globalisation, privatisation, deregulation, etc., policies which, if not soon reversed, will plunge the world not merely into a depression, but into a New Dark Age beyond the imagination of most people alive today. For over three decades, only one economist in the world has both predicted this new Depression, and has proposed policies on how to get out of it—Lyndon LaRouche. The proposals of Mr. LaRouche, a several-time U.S. Presidential candidate (including in 2004), have earned him the bitter, unrelenting enmity of the City of London and Wall Street, which the old Australian Labor Party denounced as "The Money Power". Together with the news media and government agencies under their influence on several continents, London and Wall Street have mounted what Ramsey Clarke, the former U.S. Attorney General, has called "a broader range of deliberate cunning and systematic misconduct, over a longer period of time, utilizing the power of the federal government, than any other prosecution by the U.S. government, in my time, or to my knowledge". London and Wall Street are terrified that Mr. LaRouche's "New Bretton Woods" proposal to return to a system of sovereign, protectionist nation-states (as in the early postwar period) will bankrupt the power of the world financial oligarchy, paving the way for governments to pursue policies of the "general welfare" or "common good", as opposed to enriching a tiny minority of individuals, at the expense of everyone else.
As does Mr. LaRouche, the CEC represents the Judeo-Christian-Islamic view that all human beings are created in the living image of God the Creator, and are therefore endowed with creative reason, unlike any other species. This "divine spark" of reason common to all mankind, means that
there is only one race—the human race—contrary to the racist premises of multiculturalism. Since all men and women are created equal, they are thus sovereign individuals under natural law, and the sacred duty of governments is to foster the common good—the economic and social conditions under which each and every individual may flourish, and therefore contribute to the good of his or her nation, and to mankind as a whole.
A major contributing factor to the present economic collapse, is the anti-human, bestial policies represented by the rock-drug-sex counterculture which took off in the 1960s. The "me first", "me only" policies championed by the counterculture, are precisely those also championed by the economic policies of globalisation, privatisation, etc.; indeed, the former has helped prepare the way for the latter. The CEC is committed, as is Mr. LaRouche, to urgently re-establishing a new Golden Renaissance, based upon the Classical tradition in art and philosophy, where the creative powers of each individual are fostered, to the benefit of both the individual, and of the entire society.
