Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by RL Gronk, Mar 22, 2013.
I thought Symonds was better than a 4/10.
I would of scored him atleast 6 probably more
And Matai still got a 7 for 20min
Cant see how Symonds gets only half a game, takes 6 hitups, 2 offloads anda try assist and only gets 4
He had as much impact as Matai did. Anyway must be a hard marker is all
Didn't Matai play almost 40 minutes???
I thought he played most of the half as well
Matai got injured at 37:45
Tom played 41 mins and stats as Daniel said for a 4 rating
Mason 19 mins for a 4 rating. 5 runs. How's that work?
Look no further than Gower v Symonds - you can see the reviewer just phoned it in with no thought - he or she gave both of them a 4. Similar hit-up and tackle stats for both. Symonds a try assist + 2 offloads vs Gower's 2 handling errors.
Is there an appeals process outlined in the fine print of RLW?
those ratings are all over the shop, looks more like a popularity contest than genuine ratings for effort
They cant even get the facts. Brett Stewart for example,
I have him for at least 3 offloads and 2 try assists. RLW have 0 - 0.
I thought the ratings were pretty much on the money except Symonds.
Matai deserved a 7 even though he played half the game IMO.
Maybe c eagle did his review. lol That was a joke c eagle, I mean no harm.
Separate names with a comma.