just thinking... using the manly/parra game as an example, say a punter had 10,oook on manly to win the game at $3 as they were before the game, and it played out as it did on the weekend, a manly lost through the blatant errors of the officials (as happened), it can be proven.
the punter has plenty of cash and wants to take them to court as a matter of Principal not so much to get his cash back. how do you think he'd go?
in greyhound racing, if the boxes don't open properly  or some think  run's across the track, eg another dog, person including an OFFICIAL even a bird that effects the out come of the race it's called a NO RACE, all the punter get there cash back and the dog owners share the prize money evenly.
mayb our legal eagle (dsm5) Â has an answer.
hope that all makes sense