SeaEagleRock8 said:I saw an article somewhere a couple of days ago advocating an end to the hysteria surrounding PEDs. The arguments included that testing would never be able to catch all users, and also that all use was not harmful. It gave the example of using some substance to speed up recovery from injury simply to get someone back into their sport.
The suggestion was to change the focus of the discussion of this issue to the safety aspect, with respect to the health of persons who were using PEDs, rather than simply saying any example of using any quantity of them is reprehensible and requires long term banning.
Can't think where I saw it otherwise I'd post the link.
WAMF said:Rex said:The person most worried about what others think of him is the weakest.
So is the country.
Those who take on the thoughts of Hadlee, Kent, etc are weakening this country.
So if people happen to dislike Hadley but also happen to agree with his viewpoint on a given subject matter, are they also weakening this country, Rex?
Why is it that the regular Joes out there are ruining the country? Aren't the present mob in Parliament already doing that for us?
globaleagle said:Just for kicks....this thread should be moved!
<-------
Sardines, anyone....? Ok, I'll go. Go Manly!Jatz Crackers said:Its thata way ------------>
niccipops said:
GE that post is awesome.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7 | 6 | 1 | 99 | 14 | |
8 | 6 | 2 | 66 | 14 | |
7 | 6 | 1 | 54 | 14 | |
8 | 5 | 2 | 39 | 11 | |
8 | 5 | 3 | 64 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 49 | 10 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | 73 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 8 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | -14 | 8 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | -16 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -55 | 8 | |
8 | 4 | 4 | -60 | 8 | |
8 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 7 | |
8 | 3 | 5 | -25 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -55 | 6 | |
7 | 1 | 6 | -87 | 4 | |
8 | 1 | 7 | -166 | 4 |