1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hinchcliffe????

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by MK Eagle, Aug 29, 2011.

  1. MK Eagle

    MK Eagle Well-Known Member

    1,650
    247
    Ratings:
    +247 / 0
    If they use the rewind button to see the grub who initiated the whole situation it was Hinchcliffe with a blatent elbow to the head. The penalty even went Manly's way following this showing the officials believed he was the dog responsible, so why the hell is he not suspended????? :mad:
     
  2. bigdoggy

    bigdoggy New Member

    6
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Yeah - was wondering that myself:huh:
     
  3. dowdz

    dowdz Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    2,780
    681
    Ratings:
    +853 / 5
    Same as Slater not being sighted or his elbow on DCE. I still want to know why Gifty was given 10 in the bin
     
  4. Brookvale

    Brookvale Well-Known Member

    1,510
    129
    Ratings:
    +152 / 1
    should go n buy a lottery ticket
     
  5. Chip and Chase

    Chip and Chase True Supporter Staff Member Administrator Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    12,810
    3,170
    Ratings:
    +6,282 / 44
    Let's not get carried away, the penalty against Hinchcliffe was sufficient.
     
  6. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    The ref actually gave the storm a penalty as the 1st brawl ensued and only when they had a chance to check things on the replay did they agree that Hinchcliff was the initial instigator and the penalty was reversed.
     
  7. Brookvale

    Brookvale Well-Known Member

    1,510
    129
    Ratings:
    +152 / 1
    elbowing is part n parcel of storms game.

    its a trick learned in their mma training.

    they have been doing it for over 4 years.

    so the judiciary is consistent
     
  8. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    The official explaination was that the elbow was deemed 'accidental'.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Brookie Brawler

    Brookie Brawler Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    602
    211
    Ratings:
    +428 / 6
    If u watch closely i actually believe he throws the first punch at Darcy. Maybe u can say a penalty was sufficient there but not if u r gonna charge Robbo and Foran. What a joke.
     
  10. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    But the refs gave a penalty for it so obviously they didn't see it as 'accidental' so it's interesting that the match review/judiciary would not agree.

    That could be a good thing because it will be easier to convince the judiciary that the refs also got it wrong with sin binning Glenn.
     
  11. brookiegreg

    brookiegreg Active Member

    739
    66
    Ratings:
    +66 / 0
    Yeah the refs also made a slight miscalculation in they didn't expect Blair to go jogging off.

    At the game I thought there was much longer delay before Blair got marched but looking at many replays today I was surprised by how little time there was - the refs got it right in what they did but this unexpected thing went against them and we know what then happened.

    If you look at the nrl.com replay 2 things appear certain:

    1. Glenn was consistent and walked at the same slow pace all the way to the touchline
    2. Blair was consistent and jogged all the way to then meet up with Glenn

    The refs didn't expect no 2
     

Share This Page