1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Give Me a Break!!

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Jono, Aug 7, 2012.

  1. Jono

    Jono Well-Known Member

    1,419
    175
    Ratings:
    +176 / 5
    2 to 3 weeks for Lussick when Inglis got 3 weeks for his shot, and then Burgess gets off scot free? What a load of crap. The whole NRL is just trying to give Souths this title.
     
  2. Jono

    Jono Well-Known Member

    1,419
    175
    Ratings:
    +176 / 5
    2 to 3 weeks for Lussick when Inglis got 3 weeks for his shot, and then Burgess gets off scot free? What a load of crap. The whole NRL is just trying to give Souths this title.
     
  3. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    Yes, ball carriers really need to stop running head first into cocked elbows.
     
  4. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    Yes, ball carriers really need to stop running head first into cocked elbows.
     
  5. Peter C

    Peter C Well-Known Member

    1,375
    376
    Sydney
    Ratings:
    +742 / 16
    Not sure about this one Jono, Even though Lussick's hit did no damage, it was verging on the intentional side, Travis burns got 12 weeks for something nearly the same.
     
  6. Peter C

    Peter C Well-Known Member

    1,375
    376
    Sydney
    Ratings:
    +742 / 16
    Not sure about this one Jono, Even though Lussick's hit did no damage, it was verging on the intentional side, Travis burns got 12 weeks for something nearly the same.
     
  7. the mauler

    the mauler Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    2,765
    1,139
    Ratings:
    +1,653 / 25
    Lussick can thank his lucky stars he only got 2 weeks IMO. Didn't look good and he's got a poor record at judiciary.
     
  8. the mauler

    the mauler Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    2,765
    1,139
    Ratings:
    +1,653 / 25
    Lussick can thank his lucky stars he only got 2 weeks IMO. Didn't look good and he's got a poor record at judiciary.
     
  9. niccipops

    niccipops un echidna spillo mia bevanda Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    5,436
    2,922
    Ratings:
    +5,521 / 50

    A poor record that he's taking to Parra and Rex is taking his to the dogs.
     
  10. niccipops

    niccipops un echidna spillo mia bevanda Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    5,436
    2,922
    Ratings:
    +5,521 / 50

    A poor record that he's taking to Parra and Rex is taking his to the dogs.
     
  11. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    Spot on. Could have been far worse.
    In any case, Lussick has done himself no favours re his spot in the 17 for the remainder of the season assuming all our forwards remain fit and uninjured.
     
  12. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    Spot on. Could have been far worse.
    In any case, Lussick has done himself no favours re his spot in the 17 for the remainder of the season assuming all our forwards remain fit and uninjured.
     
  13. Garts

    Garts Well-Known Member

    5,482
    363
    Ratings:
    +672 / 18
    Manly are always the victim. I have no idea why you cannot run in with a cocked elbow, the game is going soft!!!!!
     
  14. Garts

    Garts Well-Known Member

    5,482
    363
    Ratings:
    +672 / 18
    Manly are always the victim. I have no idea why you cannot run in with a cocked elbow, the game is going soft!!!!!
     
  15. EagleRock40

    EagleRock40 Well-Known Member

    972
    141
    Ourimbah, New South Wales
    Ratings:
    +211 / 4
    The problem is yet again the consistency of the referees, MRC and the judiciary. I have no problem with Lussick getting 2 weeks, I think that is spot on for what he did, even though he barely connected. But if thats the case then Inglis should have got 4-5 at least.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. EagleRock40

    EagleRock40 Well-Known Member

    972
    141
    Ourimbah, New South Wales
    Ratings:
    +211 / 4
    The problem is yet again the consistency of the referees, MRC and the judiciary. I have no problem with Lussick getting 2 weeks, I think that is spot on for what he did, even though he barely connected. But if thats the case then Inglis should have got 4-5 at least.
     
  17. bones

    bones Bones Knows Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,367
    5,100
    Ratings:
    +8,999 / 102
    I think the judiciary get most things right these days.
    [hr]
    Hey mate......You (conveniently) forgot to mention Watmough's downgrade and Issac Luke's suspension.
     
  18. bones

    bones Bones Knows Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,367
    5,100
    Ratings:
    +8,999 / 102
    I think the judiciary get most things right these days.
    [hr]
    Hey mate......You (conveniently) forgot to mention Watmough's downgrade and Issac Luke's suspension.
     
  19. bob dylan

    bob dylan Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    6,867
    2,030
    Junee
    Ratings:
    +4,409 / 130
    The only thing I have disagreed with recently is the Kasiano escape and the severity of Travis Burns' penalty.

    Think back 7 days, Watmough, or Matai's citing vs Broncos prior to last years GF. Those could of gone the other way if the judiciary was as bad as people seem to think.

    Thumbs up to the judiciary imo
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. bob dylan

    bob dylan Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    6,867
    2,030
    Junee
    Ratings:
    +4,409 / 130
    The only thing I have disagreed with recently is the Kasiano escape and the severity of Travis Burns' penalty.

    Think back 7 days, Watmough, or Matai's citing vs Broncos prior to last years GF. Those could of gone the other way if the judiciary was as bad as people seem to think.

    Thumbs up to the judiciary imo
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page