niccipops said:I don't understand much about what's going on but how does the board or Des prove guilt or innocence in this case?
If the board says he's done things but Des says he didn't, who decides?
Who's the judge and jury in a situation like this or do people just blame each other with no result and everyone left questioning?
Well an example would be emails between Des and Dave Warwick, or several staff members and players reporting this to the board. Its like a court case: If one person says you did it it becomes he said, she said. However, if 5 people back this up it becomes more credible evidence.