1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

could manly use the 3rd party like this

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by jbb/james, Dec 7, 2010.

  1. jbb/james

    jbb/james Well-Known Member

    1,705
    491
    Ratings:
    +885 / 21
    If manly want to spend up and have the cash to do so, is this an option ???I know max is still on the laegues club board so it may not be possible, if thats  not at arms length
    But
    quantum and max agree to terms regarding shares, then quantum pay max 900k extra
    And max then 3rd parties, lyon, mattai and foran 100k each for the next 3 years

    If max quit the leagues club board , would this be possible ???, just wondering
     
  2. eagles2win

    eagles2win Well-Known Member

    4,963
    494
    Ratings:
    +494 / 0
    I was wondering the same thing
     
  3. SeaEagleRock8

    SeaEagleRock8 Sea Eagle Lach Staff Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    12,598
    3,523
    Ratings:
    +6,802 / 122
    Probably would have been possible - if you hadn't broadcast it on a public forum.
     
  4. jbb/james

    jbb/james Well-Known Member

    1,705
    491
    Ratings:
    +885 / 21
    picked this quote up on fox sports re 3rd party deals. Its a nice way of understanding how it works and why brisbane should be in the firing line over the inglis deal as well

    "The point is, if you are getting paid something to be at that club, regardless of who's paying you beyond the marquee player allowance - if it's to be at that club, it's going to be in the cap."

    So if the 3rd party deals for inglis in brisbane were correct. These companies wanted inglis to be the face of there company as an example. So him moving to another club shouldnt change that unless they were arranged by the bronx and now souffs on the proviso he plays for there clubs

    With this rule explained like this is obvious why they exist, 3rd party deals. It stops the restaint of trade arguement and impending legal action, while not really giving individual clubs and advantage. The rule seems fine, although the obvious policing and ability to do so is a joke


    [hr]Post  automatically merged: [time]1291668068[/time][hr]
    **** happens
     
  5. Berkeley_Eagle

    Berkeley_Eagle Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan 2016 Tipping Competitor

    15,995
    1,849
    Ratings:
    +2,115 / 14
    $10 each from 55,000+ Manly fans @ the 2008 GF =550,000
    that's 5 deals
     
  6. jbb/james

    jbb/james Well-Known Member

    1,705
    491
    Ratings:
    +885 / 21
    what would the players have to do to represent the 55000 fans and who would arrange such a venture as the club cant be involved. Maybe silvertails could ??
     
  7. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,418
    Ratings:
    +3,625 / 132
    The Inglis thing is close to killing off 3rd party deals completely for the reasons stated. I suspect it will be swept under the carpet for that reasopn.

    Other interesting things to trend would be how manly players leaving the bongos lost their non salaray cap "3rd party" deals and how many gained them when they arrived.
     
  8. vidmar

    vidmar Well-Known Member

    1,675
    250
    Ratings:
    +258 / 0
    We do that already - It's called Football Club membership
     
  9. Mark from Brisbane

    Mark from Brisbane Living the dream Premium Member

    16,355
    5,354
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +12,777 / 258
    Yes and the 55,000 that were there on GF day should ALL be members!!

    Shame on the 53,00 that are not!
     
  10. Masked Eagle

    Masked Eagle Well-Known Member

    3,939
    919
    Ratings:
    +976 / 0
    If they are businesses who wanted to use those players specifically for Brisbane reasons then there is no problem with them being cancelled.  If there were two brisbane teams than it might be a different story.
     
  11. ayjay007

    ayjay007 Well-Known Member

    1,330
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    If they are businesses who wanted to use those players specifically for Brisbane reasons then there is no problem with them being cancelled.  If there were two brisbane teams than it might be a different story.
    [/quote]

    True,if one of them owned a new car dealership,they wouldn't want non-inglis spruking,say,Holdens,in Sydney,because that's where people would buy them.He would only be interested if they were sold in Brisbane.
     

Share This Page