Crime is a social issue and culpability lies with the perpetrator not the NRL or the club. To some extent I understand the expectation that a NRL player is expected to be ambassador for the game but how is the NRL or the club responsible for the player's poor social choices in their personal lives. You can educate them all you like but in the end the choices are theirs alone.
However everyone should be law abiding and when that line is crossed particularly in a significant way the perpetrator pays the price which ultimately may include their career or potential career and maybe their liberty. I feel for the victims and families of the victims first and foremost (If there are any victims) and then I feel sorry for the families of the individuals that commit serious crime. I never understand the press. We only read this stuff because the person at the centre of the story is a professional sports person. They don't work in a position of trust or public authority. The argument that it is the general public's right to know all of these stories about peoples' personal lives outside of their profession is nonsense because really it's none of our business.
However everyone should be law abiding and when that line is crossed particularly in a significant way the perpetrator pays the price which ultimately may include their career or potential career and maybe their liberty. I feel for the victims and families of the victims first and foremost (If there are any victims) and then I feel sorry for the families of the individuals that commit serious crime. I never understand the press. We only read this stuff because the person at the centre of the story is a professional sports person. They don't work in a position of trust or public authority. The argument that it is the general public's right to know all of these stories about peoples' personal lives outside of their profession is nonsense because really it's none of our business.