I submitted a couple of questions some time ago which have yet to be answered. But I was staggered by this limp response to the very first question in his column: 1. Why was a much loved contributor to the Club in Grant Goldman told he was no longer needed for the 2010 season? Paul ItÃ¢Â€Â™s not that Grant hadnÃ¢Â€Â™t done a wonderful job. We were given an indication on what to do and we decided to make a change to the position. Is anyone else infuriated by this answer and the weasle-words such as 'indication'? I've subsequently sent a follow-up question to Lowie asking for clarification on whether the club was reviewing its dumb decision.