Isaac Luke

[Peter C]

General consensus amongst the Channel Nine team is that Luke will not be charged, does that surprise anyone?, I don't think so.

 

[MadMarcus]

Depends on whether the Dogs win tomorrow. If they do he will go. If they don't he won't.

 

[Mark from Brisbane]

Gone for all money!!

Oh hang on it's the Grubbitohs , phew, he's safe!!

 

[wedgetail eagle]

CH9 will want Ennis v Luke, if they can.

 

[NYEagle]

There was nothing in it.

 

[the mauler]

He's got form as well. Gone for sure. They've got a handy replacement anyways.

 

[MadMarcus]

CH9 will want Ennis v Luke, if they can.

Yeah but Greenberg won't.

 

[manlyfan76]

Sbw will be the first to be charged with "Inglising" in diving and putting yourself into a dangerous position.

 

[simon64]

That was as blatant as the Jackson chicken wing......so nothing will happen.

 

[mozgrame]

Is a tard.

 

[Rodo]

There was nothing in it.

Yeah right, just like there was nothing in Choc's tackle too!

 

[Daveagle]

He was fearing for his life apparently .

 

[eagle40]

Gone, two weeks.

 

[6/71]

Should go for a week ala Choc.





Won't.

 

[robbiea]

No GF for sure .

 

[zambuck]

I don't like either team but the chooks were robbed on half time , the vermin knocked the ball down twice ref calls play on 6 to go and chooks play on score in the corner , ref said try but check, was over ruled as no try , what crap spent ages watching and slow mos and penalty count for game 10/5 to vermin any wonder they won with that much ball. but once again refs stuff up, watch todays game and see the dogs get all the favours, corruption runs deep in this game only favoured teams get looked after, that's why we did not make it, as of now I have lost all faith in the judiciary and the people that run this once great game, wonder if I will be fined for stating the true facts, any way I hope everyone on this site has a happy off season as I will be, am off cruising for the next few weeks with nothing to do but vege out and hope our team gets it **** sorted by next season, see you all then

 

[castle eagle]

also in the 2nd half s.b.hit s.b.w. with a high shot, he stayed down for a second or two then got up. ch9 showed 1 replay where you could see it was a high shot but immediately shut up about it-mustn't want to get s.b. into any trouble,whereas if it was matai there would have been a 5 minute talk & constant video reviews.

 

[Brissie Kid]

Luke should be left out. If Jim Sedaris wasn't robbed of the 1997 grand final place then Manly win that game.

 

[panash]

I don't like either team but the chooks were robbed on half time , the vermin knocked the ball down twice ref calls play on 6 to go and chooks play on score in the corner , ref said try but check, was over ruled as no try , what crap spent ages watching and slow mos and penalty count for game 10/5 to vermin any wonder they won with that much ball. but once again refs stuff up, watch todays game and see the dogs get all the favours, corruption runs deep in this game only favoured teams get looked after, that's why we did not make it, as of now I have lost all faith in the judiciary and the people that run this once great game, wonder if I will be fined for stating the true facts, any way I hope everyone on this site has a happy off season as I will be, am off cruising for the next few weeks with nothing to do but vege out and hope our team gets it ... sorted by next season, see you all then

BUT it was no try.... bounced off maloney forward...

no try !!!! correct call on both ends..

no try & roosters feed.. it wasnt like they didnt rule knock on by souths first . ( double knock on )

 

[Disco]

Yeah Roosters cant have it both ways, if Lui's was a no try then last night is a no try

Refs had nothing to do with it, Souths were a better team