COMMANDER said:Just means there is no God...
The dragons team of 2010 coached by Bennett would have taken penalty kicks to level up or get in front early on. Even if Manly scored a try, it would probably be from the sideline and likely miss the kick this year. So the 2 points may be a weak option but it is not a bad option.StuBoot said:With hindsight maybe so, but how many teams take a shot when they're down by 4?
We generally take a shot to get further in front or level up.
Most penalties in kicking range were back to back early in the count - we got three in a row up their end so you can't call all of those goalkicking chances and besides taking a shot at that stage of the game would be a softc@ck option
Budgewoi Eagle said:Even if we'd taken a penalty to make it 4-2, then they would have backed off the illegal goal line play a little, thereby giving us a fairer chance to score.
Budgewoi Eagle said:Even if we'd taken a penalty to make it 4-2, then they would have backed off the illegal goal line play a little, thereby giving us a fairer chance to score.
TokyoEagle said:Should have definitely taken the one that was in front, you have to take the points when on offer in finals games. We don't score off that set and it just motivates the opposition.
God said:Ah..... we take those penalty goal attempts and we win the game.
That is all.
God has spoken.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 | |
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 | |
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 | |
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 | |
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 | |
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |