1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do all the potential new signings still stand?

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Kevinward777, Oct 24, 2014.

  1. Kevinward777

    Kevinward777 Well-Known Member

    3,013
    1,264
    Ratings:
    +3,735 /81
    In respect to all the recent developments, where does it leave the potential signings of Mason, Vave and Matteo?
     
  2. the mauler

    the mauler Well-Known Member Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    2,850
    1,162
    Ratings:
    +1,886 /30
    I'd say it all depends on what Choc does.
     
  3. Mark from Brisbane

    Mark from Brisbane Living the dream Premium Member

    20,339
    6,788
    Ratings:
    +19,649 /383
    Not all surely they can afford Mason even if Chic stays ??
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Mavin

      Mavin Well-Known Member

      Ratings:
      +929 /43
      Chic? is that his new nickname? lol
       
    • Class of 96

      Class of 96 Well-Known Member

      711
      249
      Ratings:
      +1,214 /22
      Had a few coldies mate?
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • the mauler

        the mauler Well-Known Member Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

        2,850
        1,162
        Ratings:
        +1,886 /30
        That would be a great outcome IMO, Choc staying and Mason signing.
         
      • Ryan

        Ryan Well-Known Member

        16,333
        3,667
        Ratings:
        +9,386 /402
        We have still lost King, Stewart, Harrison & maybe one or two others, on top of the salary cap going up substantially to 6.55 million from 6.30 million.

        Bare in mind Mason would be a one year deal, so won't affect the cap hit when Foran / DCE will be renewing their contracts.

        Having Mason / Lawrence up front (size and mobility) is a good start to combating the Rooster / Rabbit types of forward packs.
         
      • PONTIAN SEA EAGLE

        PONTIAN SEA EAGLE Well-Known Member

        Ratings:
        +1,521 /114
        No that's actually his correct nickname mark i agree.
         
        • Like Like x 2

        Share This Page