Fluffy link said:thats even worse given the 3 shokers the rorters got away with, 1 leading to the first try
It has to do with paralex (spelling is wrong) error. The lens on the camera can distort the direction of the pass at times. The other issue is that a legal pass, going back out of the hands (the rule) can still float forward, as long as it wasn't directed forwards.DSM5 link said:I've been on about this for years. Â There appears no reason to not check for forward passes in the try scoring movement. Â They check for everything else. Â Why not forward passes. Â The rorters first try was off a forward pass clearly.
The dif from last season - today when the chips were down the boys didn't hide behind the excuse of a bad call- got on with the job & kicked ass. The 2008 GF could have complained about losing penalty count & bad calls but instead settled for a 40 - 0 victory.Fluffy link said:thats even worse given the 3 shokers the rorters got away with, 1 leading to the first try
Volley link said:[quote author=Fluffy link=topic=186993.msg325407#msg325407 date=1300615709]
thats even worse given the 3 shokers the rorters got away with, 1 leading to the first try
Fluffy link said:[quote author=Volley link=topic=186993.msg325442#msg325442 date=1300618143]
[quote author=Fluffy link=topic=186993.msg325407#msg325407 date=1300615709]
thats even worse given the 3 shokers the rorters got away with, 1 leading to the first try
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 | |
6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 12 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 9 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -8 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -18 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 7 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | -41 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 4 | |
6 | 0 | 6 | -90 | 2 |