1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Brett Stewart Court case

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by eagle_predator, Apr 7, 2009.

  1. eagle_predator

    eagle_predator Active Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Just heard the news Brett's court case has been adjourned until May 26th.
     
  2. niccipops

    niccipops un echidna spillo mia bevanda Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    5,603
    3,053
    Ratings:
    +5,983 /53
    Does that mean the trial will begin on that day or is it another appearance without much action going on.
     
  3. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,376
    3,987
    Ratings:
    +7,032 /106
    that is so the brief of evidence can be delivered basically. There is a good chance it could be over done and dusted by then. Getting an impartial jury together on this matter will be next to impossible
     
  4. Zep

    Zep Active Member

    Ratings:
    +8 /0
    especially if they come from the manly region??? if i was chosen for jury duty i would go in my manly gear
     
  5. niccipops

    niccipops un echidna spillo mia bevanda Premium Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    5,603
    3,053
    Ratings:
    +5,983 /53
    So I wonder when we'll hear any feedback from our friend Dave?
     
  6. Cameron

    Cameron Cambo

    Ratings:
    +662 /35
    nah u wouldnt
    because then the Police Prosecuted wouldnt have u selected

    what you would do is pretend to know nothing about the NRL or stewy and then keep voting not guilty :D
     
  7. eagle_predator

    eagle_predator Active Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Don't know how much truth you can read into this if any at all for that matter some friends of mine were at Brookie for the Rnd 3 match against the Panthers and they over heard some Manly supporters who were near them saying that Brett didn't do nothing wrong as they seen it all and they will go to court for him and telling the court just that.
     
  8. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,376
    3,987
    Ratings:
    +7,032 /106
    I would put zero trust in that source
     
  9. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    18,944
    1,610
    Ratings:
    +5,060 /183
    i trust your judgement dan
     
  10. eagle_predator

    eagle_predator Active Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    I would put zero trust in that source
    [/quote]

    You never know there could of been someone standing back in the distance away from where Brett got out of the taxi and seen the whole thing while it is possible ? i agree the story does sound weak.
     
  11. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,376
    3,987
    Ratings:
    +7,032 /106
    I would put zero trust in that source
    [/quote]

    You never know there could of been someone standing back in the distance away from where Brett got out of the taxi and seen the whole thing while it is possible ? i agree the story does sound weak.
    [/quote]

    no, they would have interevened and been interviewed. It sounds like some manly fan bignoting himself to his mates trying to sound like they know precisely what went on. A very pure example of how white lies become big lies.

    I would treat the source as nothing more than that
     
  12. eagle_predator

    eagle_predator Active Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Surely this can't be true just heard on the radio that Brett has had his AVO extended for a further 3 months didn't the family moved out right ?? WTF
     
  13. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,376
    3,987
    Ratings:
    +7,032 /106
    The AVO would likely be against the family, not his home

    Anyway its best we dont speculate
     

Share This Page