Manly To Win! said:Difficult question... With Wolfman in, we probably do, but there's several clubs i.e. Newcastle, Parra, Tigers, Cowboys, Warriors who would come very close to matching ours.
Napper said:Didn't want to suprise seaeagles4life. 😛
On a serious note, not just coz i support them, i still dont see a backline as strong as Manly's.
Thoughts?
Napper said:Manly To Win! said:Difficult question... With Wolfman in, we probably do, but there's several clubs i.e. Newcastle, Parra, Tigers, Cowboys, Warriors who would come very close to matching ours.
Every player minus 1 winger in our backline is an international. And won a premiership or 2 Noone else comes close.
Fro said:so when someone goes to another club for more money they are a weasel, but when they come to us for more money they are "improving themselves".
is that how it works??
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 17 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 108 | 30 |
2 | Storm | 15 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 202 | 28 |
3 | Bulldogs | 15 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 92 | 28 |
4 | Warriors | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 26 |
5 | Broncos | 16 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 68 | 22 |
6 | Panthers | 15 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 21 |
7 | Dolphins | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 162 | 20 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 58 | 20 |
9 | Roosters | 15 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 14 | 20 |
10 | Sharks | 16 | 8 | 0 | 8 | -4 | 20 |
11 | Dragons | 15 | 6 | 0 | 9 | -49 | 18 |
12 | Cowboys | 16 | 6 | 1 | 9 | -140 | 17 |
13 | Knights | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -67 | 16 |
14 | Tigers | 16 | 6 | 0 | 10 | -82 | 16 |
15 | Eels | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | -103 | 16 |
16 | Rabbitohs | 17 | 6 | 0 | 11 | -129 | 14 |
17 | Titans | 15 | 4 | 0 | 11 | -144 | 14 |