Worst coaching move/decision ever?

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
Napper said:
Kiwi Eagle said:
The Eagle said:
Lang saying souffs would get every accolade in his last season and getting not one

Lang for playing his son for so long

Sheens for losing 4 props and getting 2 to replace them, Sheens for Moltzen, Farah at half

Martin Lang was a legend, great to watch

His performance in the opening 20 of the 2003 GF was epic. Think he might have retired after that game

Played in 04 didnt he? When SBW rocked him with that shot. I liked Lang. Kamakaze style but tough as nails, good prop.

That shot you are refering too was on Joel Clinton from memory
 
Napper said:
Kiwi Eagle said:
The Eagle said:
Lang saying souffs would get every accolade in his last season and getting not one

Lang for playing his son for so long

Sheens for losing 4 props and getting 2 to replace them, Sheens for Moltzen, Farah at half

Martin Lang was a legend, great to watch

His performance in the opening 20 of the 2003 GF was epic. Think he might have retired after that game

Played in 04 didnt he? When SBW rocked him with that shot. I liked Lang. Kamakaze style but tough as nails, good prop.

That shot you are refering too was on Joel Clinton from memory
 
Napper said:
Frank said:
Napper said:
What is it?

This year - Dugan 5/8 along and the dropping of Sandow.

(and i mean decisions for his team no Hasler going to dogs bs)

Bringing Sandow back.

Feel sorry for Sandow. s**t coaches. s**t forwards. I rate him. He's a good halfback.

Watch him for an entire game. He is the laziest piece of crap I have seen on the field for a long time. He goes missing for extended periods when he should be running the side. He is an absolute myth.
 
Napper said:
Frank said:
Napper said:
What is it?

This year - Dugan 5/8 along and the dropping of Sandow.

(and i mean decisions for his team no Hasler going to dogs bs)

Bringing Sandow back.

Feel sorry for Sandow. s**t coaches. s**t forwards. I rate him. He's a good halfback.

Watch him for an entire game. He is the laziest piece of crap I have seen on the field for a long time. He goes missing for extended periods when he should be running the side. He is an absolute myth.
 
Utility Player said:
Hamster Huey said:
Chris Anderson trying to coach a side to play with just one marker in defence.

Wasn't Anderson also the guy who tried the flat attack inovation as well.

How dare you criticise Northern Eagle great Brett Kimmorley's playing style. Shame sir, shame.
 
Utility Player said:
Hamster Huey said:
Chris Anderson trying to coach a side to play with just one marker in defence.

Wasn't Anderson also the guy who tried the flat attack inovation as well.

How dare you criticise Northern Eagle great Brett Kimmorley's playing style. Shame sir, shame.
 
Utility Player said:
Hamster Huey said:
Chris Anderson trying to coach a side to play with just one marker in defence.

Wasn't Anderson also the guy who tried the flat attack inovation as well.

Ah yes, the Northern Eagles flat attack.

I cant recall who we were playing but it was Brookie on a Sunday and Kimmorley threw up 3 intercepts. I knew we were in for some structural change after that. Ahh the memories.
 
Utility Player said:
Hamster Huey said:
Chris Anderson trying to coach a side to play with just one marker in defence.

Wasn't Anderson also the guy who tried the flat attack inovation as well.

Ah yes, the Northern Eagles flat attack.

I cant recall who we were playing but it was Brookie on a Sunday and Kimmorley threw up 3 intercepts. I knew we were in for some structural change after that. Ahh the memories.
 
Masked Eagle said:
Moondog said:
Hamster Huey said:
Warren Ryan sub'ing both Roach and Sironen off the ground in the '89 GF while Balmain led and need to defend.

.
That's the one I'd pick. Masterstroke from Woza! :p

A few years ago they replayed the game on ABC Grandstand and the Wok was giving his comments (when he wasn't asleep). He still maintains he would have subbed off Siro and Blocker because in his words they were spent and thought they had nothing to give.

Sirro and Blocker have always been filthy at the sub off and believed they were right to stay on longer.

Speaking of the Wok, and interesting piece of commentary on the weekend. As Dave Taylor was apparantly rude enough to throw a few defenders off during a run just after halftime, Warren Ryan was forced to stop his story about onions on his belt and focus on the play but could only comment, '...look at that; look at that.'

You're on the radio Wok. Moving pictures are on that new fandangled television.
 
Masked Eagle said:
Moondog said:
Hamster Huey said:
Warren Ryan sub'ing both Roach and Sironen off the ground in the '89 GF while Balmain led and need to defend.

.
That's the one I'd pick. Masterstroke from Woza! :p

A few years ago they replayed the game on ABC Grandstand and the Wok was giving his comments (when he wasn't asleep). He still maintains he would have subbed off Siro and Blocker because in his words they were spent and thought they had nothing to give.

Sirro and Blocker have always been filthy at the sub off and believed they were right to stay on longer.

Speaking of the Wok, and interesting piece of commentary on the weekend. As Dave Taylor was apparantly rude enough to throw a few defenders off during a run just after halftime, Warren Ryan was forced to stop his story about onions on his belt and focus on the play but could only comment, '...look at that; look at that.'

You're on the radio Wok. Moving pictures are on that new fandangled television.
 
This is a really good thread idea by the way
 
This is a really good thread idea by the way
 
Team P W L PD Pts
3 3 0 48 6
4 3 1 28 6
3 2 1 10 6
4 2 2 39 4
3 2 1 28 4
3 2 1 15 4
3 2 1 14 4
2 1 1 13 4
2 1 1 6 4
3 2 1 -3 4
3 1 2 0 2
3 1 2 -5 2
3 1 2 -15 2
3 1 2 -22 2
3 1 2 -36 2
2 0 2 -56 2
3 0 3 -64 0
Back
Top Bottom