1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wise words from Roebuck

Discussion in 'Cricket Forum' started by Matabele, Feb 28, 2005.

  1. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    A law unto himself, Lee ought to be bounced out
    By Peter Roebuck
    February 28, 2005

    Brett Lee must be dropped from the Australia side for the rest of this tour of New Zealand. His beamer directed at Brendon McCullum on Saturday was merely the latest in a series of violent deliveries sent down by a pace bowler at best reckless in his approach and at worst utterly unwilling to remain within long-accepted parameters governing conduct on the cricket field.

    If Australia's captain, coach and manager did not have sharp words with Lee after the match then they stand in dereliction of their duties.

    No team seriously seeking to improve its reputation for sportsmanship can tolerate the brutal beamers sent down in recent times by the supposedly amiable competitor. Unfortunately the signs are not promising. After the match Ricky Ponting talked about dew and slippery run-ups. In his heart he knows better. Maybe he has been frustrated by the nonsense spouted by New Zealanders eager to distract attention from the lame performance of their team.

    Lee's head-hunter was the nastiest ball seen on a cricket field since, well, the beamer the same player directed at Abdul Razzaq in the one-day final in Sydney. Moreover the circumstances were similar in that both opponents had irritated the fast bowler. Previously Razzaq had sent two disgraceful beamers to Lee whereupon the umpire had removed him from the attack. Not that he had many more overs to bowl, or chances to nail a fierce opponent.

    Lee duly greeted the Pakistani with several scorching bumpers. Then he sent down a bean-ball, a delivery that became the talk of grade cricket. Apparently Tony Greig condemned the ball on television, in which case more power to his elbow. Others defended the local man, saying he would not hurt a fly. Odd, though, that Razzaq was the victim of this "accidental" delivery. Odd that the ball was not merely a yard higher than usual but also directed at a batsman standing outside his leg stump.

    McCullum had done nothing wrong except introduce himself as a dangerous and confrontational opponent with a suspected weakness against rising deliveries. Lee welcomed him with a bumper and was justifiably dismayed when the delivery was deemed to be illegitimate even though it barely passed over a ducking batsman. Lee continued with a flyer that was cut over cover for a couple of runs.

    Then came the beamer, hurled at the batsman's chest and clearly capable of breaking ribs. It was an ugly and deplorable delivery whose timing was bound to raise eyebrows even among members of the cheer squad. Although he had been bowling admirably, Lee had been having another bad day in the field, with overthrows and other mishaps indicating a distracted state of mind.

    On television Michael Slater defended his former colleague, saying that he was not the sort of man to try to harm an opponent with an unfair delivery. Slater is a fine commentator but on this occasion may have erred on the side of generosity. Beamers can indeed be sent down accidentally - Glenn McGrath once struck Mark Ramprakash on the ear with a bean-ball that appeared out of the blue and that everyone sensed was a mishap. Most beamers, though, are deliberate. Context is crucial.

    Lee immediately expressed regret for his action but his credibility has been worn to the bone. Apologies are easy and it is extraordinary that so much significance is attached to them. In 1993 Wasim Akram apologised after delivering the nastiest beamer seen in 20 years at Chris Adams, a county batsman who had accused him of ball-tampering. Astonishingly, no action was taken against him. At the lunch break the pair almost came to blows. Wasim is charming and overrated.

    Beamers are a blight on the game. Exchanges between batsmen and bowlers are built on trust. Batsmen understand that bouncers may be directed at them and prepare accordingly. Otherwise they may as well take up marbles. No one blamed Lee for the rearing deliveries that struck Matthew Papps. Not that his action has always been above suspicion. His bumper that removed Marcus Trescothick in Perth in 2002 was sent down from wide of the crease and with an open chest, a ruse now in abeyance. At least the ball to the Englishman bounced. Bean-balls are incomparably more dangerous because they elude detection by avoiding the usual channels studied by batsmen awaiting a delivery.

    Besides telling Lee that Australians do not bowl beamers, officials might also point out that court cases can result from incidents on the field. If a spear tackle can become a matter of litigation and damages then so can a beamer. As McCullum was not hurt he might not be able to start a civil case. His refusal to accept Lee's apology indicated his view of the matter. Nor was he alone in his opinion.

    Lee's beamer spoilt an otherwise superb fightback by an Australian side that contains several brilliant fieldsmen, some doughty operators and many fine sportsmen, a side that ought to rise above the sort of viciousness witnessed on Saturday night. Apart from anything else, they are representing the nation.
     
  2. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    I reakon there is more to this guy than the beamer.

    Was he calling for Razzaq's head after his 3 in one game??

    I seriously doubt it.

    He is either a Lee hater or a Fitzy - just says crap to get his name in the papers
     
  3. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    Roebuck has been a respected columnist in the Herald for over a decade. He's not like me. :wink:

    He makes mention of Razzaq being disgraceful. But how many times does Lee have to do this before you realise it's more than dew on the ball?

    He's a cowardly little prat - a tail end bully.
     
  4. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    13,234
    186
    Ratings:
    +212 / 5
    I love it how Mata finds articles to support his bias but misses them when they take the opposite. Roebuck has gone too far!!!

    Mata :arrow:
     
  5. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    I find it odd that shane warne, the greatest spin bowler ever has trouble pitching some of his slow deliveries in the right place yet Lee who bowls with extreme pace and much less room for error can direct a non practiced ball exactly where he wants it every time he chooses to play it.

    Furk me dead - he must deliberatly bowl wides on a regular basis and heres me thinking its because fast bowling is bloody hard and difficult to be consistent. Either that or Lee is the best fast bowler to ever play and he is just toying with people because he could hit a 5 cent coin 99 times out of 100.

    This wanka needs to start following another sport
     
  6. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    13,234
    186
    Ratings:
    +212 / 5
    Can't argue with any of that!!!
     
  7. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    McGrath who bowls 20+ km/h slower than Lee hit ramprakash in the EAR.


    Beam balls are easy to bowl accidentally at 150km/h+ im sure.

    But to say he has perfect control over them and struggles with line and lenght when pitching a legal delivery is a very stupic thing.
     
  8. Fro

    Fro Well-Known Member

    8,337
    181
    Ratings:
    +245 / 0
    The one to Razzaq was a dead set square up for the 2 in one over he copped earlier. was no coincedence he ripped it in to that particular batsman as soon as he walked out there.

    The Mccullum one may have been an accident but its a bit like the boy who cried wolf by now, hes done it to many times for his apologies to mean much.

    As for having a dig at Roebuck, you obviously dont know much in regard to Cricket journos round the world Fluff. hes one of the best and is not prone to hysteria. although I dont agree 100% with his sentiments in this article he is one of the better writers.

    Wont matter much soon, the real cricket will be on soon and it will Be McGrath Gillespie Kasprowicz and Warne bowling for Aus.
     
  9. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    mate i think Lee will get the nodd over kasper - after the ODI series where kasper was ordinary and Lee was good.

    AB was leading that way in an interview.

    It doesnt matter either way as we will flog them
     
  10. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    Agree 100% with Fro
     
  11. Fro

    Fro Well-Known Member

    8,337
    181
    Ratings:
    +245 / 0
    Holy ****, someones written something Matas agrees with 100%, I'm humbled :lol:

    Must be the clean country air, peoples brains work better on the good side of the sandstone curtain.

    And Fluffy, i'll say this slowly so you will understand it....... One Day form and Test form are two different things, that means they are not the same thing.

    Otherwise Symonds would be a permanent test player. Some say he should be anywya but thats a story for another day.
     
  12. Volley

    Volley Well-Known Member

    3,809
    315
    Ratings:
    +581 / 21
    Symonds, a test player :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  13. Fro

    Fro Well-Known Member

    8,337
    181
    Ratings:
    +245 / 0
    I didntsay Symonds was a test player. My point is if Lee should be an automatic selection in the test side because of one day form then Symonds should also be.

    Neither of them deserves a spot
     
  14. Volley

    Volley Well-Known Member

    3,809
    315
    Ratings:
    +581 / 21
    I know you didn't say Symonds should be a test player, I just found it funny because some poeple believe he should be, as you said.

    On the Lee issue, I believe Lee has a bit more to offer, but that's not saying Kaspa is bad, he is a class act, but I just feel has a tad more.
     

Share This Page