1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Vs Canberra Stats

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by fLIP, Mar 14, 2006.

  1. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    Team Stats

    <--Sea Eagles Raiders

    254 -Tackles- 291
    8 -Offloads- 15
    13 -Kicks- 13
    2 -Try Assists- 3
    3 -Line Breaks- 6
    64 -Hit Ups- 73
    445 -Meters Gained- 546
    34 -DH Runs- 31
    15 -Handling Errors- 13
    27 -Missed Tackles- 28
    4 -Scrums- 9
    12 -Penalties- 8


    Tackles:

    1. Monaghan : 34
    2. Kennedy : 33
    3. Watmough : 32
    4. Menzies : 30
    5. Kite : 21
    6. Bryant : 18
    7. King : 17
    8. Dunley : 15
    9. Bell : 11
    10. Leului : 10
    11. Matai : 7
    12. Burns : 7
    13. Williamson : 6
    14. Orford : 5
    15. Hicks : 4
    16. Stephenson : 2
    17. Stewart : 2


    Hitups:

    1. Kite : 14
    2. King : 12
    3. Bryant : 10
    4. Kennedy : 8
    5. Leului : 7
    6. Watmough : 5
    7. Menzies : 3
    8. Matai : 2
    9. Bell : 1
    10. Stewart : 1
    11. Williamson : 1


    Meters Gained:

    1. Kite : 94
    2. King : 80
    3. Kennedy : 69
    4. Bryant : 65
    5. Leuluai : 54
    6. Watmough : 37
    7. Matai : 16
    8. Menzies : 14
    9. Stewart : 8
    10. Williamson : 5
    11. Bell : 3


    Errors:

    1. Stewart : 3
    2. Orford : 3
    3. Watmough : 3
    4. Bell : 2
    5. Hicks : 1
    6. Monaghan : 1
    7. Menzies : 1
    8. Kennedy : 1


    Line Breaks:

    1. Bell : 3


    Try Assists:

    1. Orford : 1
    2. Stewart : 1
     
  2. Ridgey

    Ridgey New Member

    27
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Sources in the club say that one of the key issues that Des will be focusing on this year is repeat sets of six from goal line drop outs. Apparently in 2005 we were ranked 15th in the league for forcing repeat sets on goal line drop outs and its a pet bone of contention for Hasler. Clearly in the first half of the Canberra game we saw Orford's willingness to grubber in goal and force another set. I have some issue with this as I love to see teams run the ball on the final tackle. Its generally unexpected, keeps the opposition in two minds, and in situations where teams attempt to slide on their line (a la Many on the right hand side on Saturday night) can lead to easy points.
     
  3. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,370
    3,610
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,462 / 74
    I think he should be concentrating on

    1) holding onto the ball. The amount of knock-ons and mistakes was unnacceptable on saturday

    2) Defense

    3) giving away easy metres and stupid penalties

    then worry about repeat sets, you can have as many sets as you like but if you keep dropping it and letting in tries what is the point?
     
  4. Ridgey

    Ridgey New Member

    27
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    Obviously he can focus on a number of issues at once, and the fact that the defence was poor on Saturday does not excuse failing to force repeat sets - thats something we also need to develop to become a more complete team.

    My biggest concern is the sloppy defence around the ruck area. It seemed on Saturday night that we had prepped for a game against the Tigers. The defence was spread accross the field as if out major concern was having to address lateral movement of the ball. A good point (and repeatedly regularly) by the Fox Sports commentators was that Manly would have been better off bunching their defence in order to combat a Raiders side who had clearly turned up with the intention of making easy yards around our big men who were all too frequently content to be lazy around the ruck and wait for someone else to come out of the line.
     
  5. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    9,609
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    Good to have those stats, thanks.

    Maybe they should be made a sticky?

    Didn't Monas have a good game?
     
  6. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,370
    3,610
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,462 / 74
    how can Bell have made 3 line breaks and only 3 metres.
    methinks the statisticians are a little loopy
     
  7. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    9,609
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    And 2 tries has to be wrong.

    Is he the new princess?
     
  8. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    The stats are from NRL.com.

    I am pretty sure a line break can result in a try. But a try does not result as metres gained. I also think they may only be the metres gained from the hit ups. Not overall metres gained. I can't imagine half the side making zero.
     
  9. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    they are definatly the metres gained from a "hit up" which is where the forwards should be excelling. interesting that king was right up the top
     
  10. KaZa

    KaZa Well-Known Member

    2,082
    164
    Ratings:
    +233 / 20
    so it wasnt just me.. Watmough was awful statistically too. Beaver shocking. Thats close to the worst ive seen Beaver play. I didnt even notice him in the game. Kennedy was ok.. but our 2nd row needs a shake up.. no competition for spots.

    Monas is a machine. I wasnt aware he made the top tackler. Good stuff.
     
  11. Nutzcraw

    Nutzcraw Active Member

    4,827
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0
    I said in the thread "my manly man of the match" mona's was by far the best... the stats tell a similiar story.. he was one of few that can be pleased with what they did....
     
  12. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
  13. Nutzcraw

    Nutzcraw Active Member

    4,827
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0

    Stick with me flip.. i think you'll find over the course of the year.. i'm rarely wrong! :dance: :drunk:
     
  14. bluesabilly1954

    bluesabilly1954 Member

    48
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    .....wow fellas (sarcasm intended) ,didnt King have a good match (no sarcasm intended) credit where credit is due......good on him :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
     
  15. Pepi

    Pepi Well-Known Member

    816
    219
    Ratings:
    +318 / 20
    Not being a sheep like many other posters, i believe King played solid, he was statistically our 2nd best prop.
     
  16. The Gronk

    The Gronk Well-Known Member

    3,475
    37
    Ratings:
    +37 / 0
    Your five eighth shouldn't be your leading tackler. I would have thought Dunley would have made more, that way Monas wouldn't be completely buggered when we actually got the ball.
     
  17. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    17,768
    1,417
    Ratings:
    +3,624 / 132
    IT was solid - but still kite and king should be over 100m, lulu and bryant should be close to 100 from hit ups as should the second row, certainly less than 50m from any forward in hit ups is poor.
     

Share This Page