1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Video Ref

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Canteen Worker, Aug 5, 2007.

  1. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    13,234
    186
    Ratings:
    +212 / 5
    What are thoughts on the Beaver try and Hicks tries.

    Were the refs right or were we robbed?
     
  2. willstyles

    willstyles Active Member

    1,644
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0
    Beaver's was a try. That decision was f*cked.

    Hicks...there was plenty of doubt. Doubt of the obstruction and doubt over the grounding. I thought they would let the obstruction go (nothing in it), but I don't think he grounded it. I would've been surprised if they'd given it.
     
  3. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    Hicks try was right in front of me.

    Without any bias the first look said try for sure. Second, benefit of the doubt.
     
  4. CliffyIsGod

    CliffyIsGod Well-Known Member

    1,469
    16
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0
    Beaver's was a try. Hicks not sure.
     
  5. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    All these refs are dumb schmucks. I suspect few of them have any inkling wjat "benefit of the doubt" means.
     
  6. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    14,921
    2,690
    Ratings:
    +6,135 / 289
    There were a plethora of wrong errors by the refs in this game against Manly. One thing that concerns me is the way the penalty count always gets to 5-1 or something similar against us to start games. Maybe this is why we consistently have poor starts...

    I hope Hasler takes the game up with Finch.

    Right from the start...that hand to knock the ball out of Kite's hands....
     
  7. ManlyBacker

    ManlyBacker Winging it Staff Member

    11,596
    843
    Ratings:
    +971 / 7
    I will be very interested in the ref's game report on Beaver's try. Was he half a centimetre in front or was it Lyon? Either way it should have been paid.
     
  8. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    14,921
    2,690
    Ratings:
    +6,135 / 289
    They'll not get a game this week. I'll tell you now. I was livid !! That would have taken Beaver above Lamb wouldn't it?
     
  9. willstyles

    willstyles Active Member

    1,644
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0
    I think the video ref's ruling was that Lyon was in front, and then came within 10m of the play or something absurd.

    It was a f*cked decision. Simple as that.
     
  10. Corso_Pete

    Corso_Pete Well-Known Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    1,473
    30
    Ratings:
    +35 / 0
    I tend to look at these things from the view that if it was the opposing side scoring those tries and it went to the video ref would I have been happy if the try had been awarded.

    In both tries I would have blown up deluxe if they had been awarded. Lyon was in front of Orford and came within 10m of the ball. He was offside according the letter of the law. Whether the rule is right is another topic.
     
  11. Kiwi Eagle

    Kiwi Eagle Moderator Staff Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    14,488
    1,734
    Ratings:
    +2,425 / 31
    Yep Pete is right, to the letter of the law, both calls correct. In practical sense, 1 was correct.
     

Share This Page