Tim Sheen's love affair

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.

Rambo1987

Bencher
Firstly I thought Robbie Farah was lucky to be picked to tour with the kangaroos (mind you I dont like either Farah or Ennis) let alone being picked in the game against the England.

He will be coming back with a bruised chin ........
 
he is a far site better than Gidley but I would prefer Ennis over Farrah and Smith over all of them. Smith can go the whole 80 too
 
ads link said:
I would take anyone over Gidley.
A year or two ago Gidley was a jack-in-the-box whose dynamism and energy made him an automatic pick even though he was not really top in any one position. He hasn't been playing to that level in recent times, though he is still a good player. Actually it is not often a player at this level stands out from the pack in terms of energy, stamina, and fitness, the last one I can recall is Rodney Howe.
 
Att gidley was an outstanding player, but he had the talent that kurt posesses in his little finger.

If kurt was not a gidley and not a knight he would struggle for a test jersey
 
SeaEagleRock8 link said:
[quote author=ads link=topic=181966.msg245102#msg245102 date=1256953584]
I would take anyone over Gidley.
A year or two ago Gidley was a jack-in-the-box whose dynamism and energy made him an automatic pick even though he was not really top in any one position. He hasn't been playing to that level in recent times, though he is still a good player. Actually it is not often a player at this level stands out from the pack in terms of energy, stamina, and fitness, the last one I can recall is Rodney Howe.
[/quote]

very subtle SER8.
 
Team P W L PD Pts
3 3 0 48 6
4 3 1 28 6
3 2 1 10 6
4 2 2 39 4
3 2 1 28 4
3 2 1 15 4
3 2 1 14 4
2 1 1 13 4
2 1 1 6 4
3 2 1 -3 4
3 1 2 0 2
3 1 2 -5 2
3 1 2 -15 2
3 1 2 -22 2
3 1 2 -36 2
2 0 2 -56 2
3 0 3 -64 0
Back
Top Bottom