Is there becoming an increasing conflict of interest???? First 9 has the rights to choose what game they show (only a month or so ahead) unlike the AFL that allocates the TV games and mixes up the telecasts. Secondly the director then gets to choose what footage is shown to the Video Review panel on a Monday. It was only because a camera passed on a video (without permission) of Barrett's high elbow that he even got caught. The camera is now to be censured. With 9 dipping in to pay contracts for players like Jason Stevens (last year), Gasnier and others does this represent a conflict of interest. Does it mean that tape of these players might be with-held instead of freely available? In my opinion 9 has too much power in the game and need to be reigned in, similar to that great moment yesterday when that Soldier in East Timor told Jessica Rowe that the armed guards they had placed in the newscast to make it look unsafe were a joke. See SMH for the video!!!