No we'll be complacent and will barely win by 10-12.
SeaEagles v Sharks @Brookie Rd6 Heritage round Game day thread #GoManly
- Thread starter Berkeley_Eagle
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
ManlyBacker
Winging it
SeaEagleRock8 said:
OK. But I will wait for the OFFICIAL loss declaration by mick and bet accordingly with tomwaterhouse.com.
Every time I see this level of confidence (read over confidence) we seem to get our pants pulled down.
I agree that IF we play to our potential we should smash em, but I have a niggling feeling in the pit of my stomach that tells me an ambush is in the making here.
I agree that IF we play to our potential we should smash em, but I have a niggling feeling in the pit of my stomach that tells me an ambush is in the making here.
The Royal Soup
First Grader
Sharks always come to play against us, too much history there, this will be a battle
AshfieldBazza
Reserve Grader
Ralphie said:
So true, this is how i feel about this Sunday, can't wait for Sunday Arvo footy but slighty nervous about it. Big expectation that we will win by large margin doesn't bode well for us alot of the time and we struggle but hopefully we overcome it this week. With Carney out we should strangle them out of the game surely!!
We have win as I'm going with a Sharks fan and a Norths fan so will get a bagging if we lose!
I really really hate these games....those ones after we have played our hearts out to defeat a top side(s) the week(s) before and then turn up against a side we should beat easily to get our backsides smacked....for example the Titans game last year is one that springs to mind.
Matt Parish, when he was assistant coach, told me when talking about this in Leeds last year that in reality most players are within 1% of ability of each other, barring of course the games superstars.
And then he went on to say that as most of the players are close (in ability) to each other that it's largely their mental attitude that can determine the outcome of a game.
And that's what worries me, mentally are they "up" for this game or mentally are they just thinking of this as a walk in the park!!
MIGOTY in my opinion!!
Matt Parish, when he was assistant coach, told me when talking about this in Leeds last year that in reality most players are within 1% of ability of each other, barring of course the games superstars.
And then he went on to say that as most of the players are close (in ability) to each other that it's largely their mental attitude that can determine the outcome of a game.
And that's what worries me, mentally are they "up" for this game or mentally are they just thinking of this as a walk in the park!!
MIGOTY in my opinion!!
Mals said:
Larissa said:
I have never had to resist typing something so much on this forum (a witty repose)....as I have after reading these 2 posts.
must.....move......fingers......away....from.....keyboard.....
dowdz said:
Well I was all like "lol @ you"
Then I went and did the exact same thing.
Stevo said:
I'd be happy with that @[Stevo] a win is a win and 2 points are 2 points
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 |
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 |
|
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 |
|
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 |
|
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |
