Last week I made a statement. The statement was that my depression was a result of marijuana use at university. 100% of readers seem to think that this could well be a very likely explanation. The Prime Minister of Australia thinks likewise. It is also an opinion of one of the pre-eminent experts in Australia who has intimately examined my case. However, we have our own resident expert in Daniel Hewes who seems to think it is not a sufficient explanation AND, despite the fact that my explanation is perfectly understandable to the vast majority of this site and the nationÃƒÂ¢Ã¢Â‚Â¬Ã¢Â„Â¢s PM, wants to place the onus of proof on me? This is a nonsense. My case is available for examination at any point that is convenient. But I think we can all see the sense of where the REAL onus of proof lies.