Ron E. Gibbs said:... and if we have to pay "overs" to keep a local player we've developed this far, we should. There's no better young player in the game.
I don't really get the "overs" point, Ron (and others). If he is an outstanding talent, as everyone has been saying for a couple of years now, then he is worth a lot and why wouldn't we pay him decent coin?
Surely it's other clubs who would have to offer "overs", to have any hope of luring him away from our happy, successful club?