1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New interpretation helps tryscorers

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Berkeley_Eagle, Feb 25, 2009.

  1. Berkeley_Eagle

    Berkeley_Eagle Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan 2016 Tipping Competitor

    15,995
    1,849
    Ratings:
    +2,115 / 14
    New interpretation helps tryscorers

    By Steve Jancetic | February 25, 2009 12:00am
    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/sport/nrl/story/0,26799,25106404-5006066,00.html


    A MORE liberal interpretation of the benefit of the doubt rule by video referees is set to result in an increase in the number of tries awarded during the 2009 NRL season.

    While no rule change has been implemented by the NRL, an adjustment in thinking will see the onus of proof swing in favour of the tryscorer.

    Rather than looking for a reason to award the try, the man in the box will instead look for a reason not to give the try, with any benefit of the doubt to favour the attacker.

    "We're looking at the rules of the game and using them and saying 'well what has he done wrong, what rule has he not abided in scoring that try," referee's boss Robert Finch said.

    "When you score a try in possession of the football, the rule book talks about placing the ball on the ground with your hand or hands.

    "It doesn't mention control, it doesn't mention downward pressure - so when we're adjudicating on a try, we're not considering control or downward pressure because the rulebook doesn't state that.

    "For us to take the try off them, they need to have broken a rule.

    "If we can't the clarify (whether a rule has been broken) or 'geez I'm not sure, I think he had his hand on the ball or I think it's downward pressure', we'll give the try."

    But while the video referee will continue to hold sway when it comes to contentious tries, he will no longer have the ability to rule on infringements during the normal run of play, unless they involve a player being put on report for foul play.

    The move comes on the back of the two-referee system being implemented in all NRL games this season, a system Finch says has received wide-spread support from coaches during the opening few weeks of trial matches.

    "As a game we need to say either we embrace technology and the game becomes slower or we use it sparingly ... and accept that sometimes a human's going to make a mistake," Finch said.

    "We're not not moving away from technology, but we're using it where we need to."

    One aspect of the 'pocket' or 'assistant' referee that has become obvious during trial games is the different depth of their positions behind the attacking line during games.

    Finch admitted the referees were scouting the teams they were about to officiate so as to familiarise themselves with different styles of play.

    "For example, from what I've seen of St George Illawarra briefly this year, they're playing very deep and attacking very deep, so we need the pocket referees to be deep," Finch said.

    "The distance is not a massive issue, we get in and we get out. With other sides that play flatter, we can stand flatter.

    "The distance and angles are dependant on the teams that your refereeing and the field positions that they're in."
     
  2. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,370
    3,610
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,462 / 74
    I think that is a good move. It should always have been interpreted like that
     
  3. ManlyBacker

    ManlyBacker Winging it Staff Member

    11,596
    843
    Ratings:
    +971 / 7
    I hate this interpretation. Last year there were a whole heap of tries where a fingernail scraped the top of the ball. That just doesn't work for me and changes completely the game I have watched for over 40 years. I want to see the ball placed down over the line with at least the smallest measure of control for a try to be given.
     
  4. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,370
    3,610
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,462 / 74
    Grounding should be viewed in Real Time IMO

    Slow motion for onside, and whether they are in play. Grounding, if it looks like a try in real time, IMO it is a try
     
  5. Zep

    Zep Active Member

    1,692
    8
    Ratings:
    +8 / 0
    I have always said that when a video ref looks at a manly try he always looks for a way it shouldn't be a try, for any other team they always seem to look how it could be a try.
     
  6. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    13,234
    186
    Ratings:
    +212 / 5
    We had some shockers last year and in a few games I wondered if we were going to get any tries.
     
  7. Rex

    Rex Well-Known Member

    4,334
    761
    Ratings:
    +2,338 / 60
    While cement truck Harrigan has any influence, any reduction in video ref's ability to disallow tries favours Manly.

    Benefit of the doubt has been non-existent since inception of the rule.
     

Share This Page