1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Name one team

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Matabele, Aug 14, 2005.

  1. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    I'll say it again. Can anyone name one team in the NRL that would want Monaghan on their books as their long term half back option?

    Even Souths might be out of the running after today's display.
     
  2. ads

    ads Well-Known Member

    1,633
    26
    Ratings:
    +28 / 1
    I think he is fine as a player, just not as a teams main and especially not sole playmaker.
     
  3. DVS Matt

    DVS Matt Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    1,715
    12
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0
    In my honest opinion the only teams that would want him to play starting Half Back would be:

    Roosters
    Warriors
    Raiders
    Rabbitohs
     
  4. lasvegas

    lasvegas Member

    898
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0
    raiders couldnt wait to get rid of him last time.
    warriors will play fein or hohiaa
    roosters arent that stupid surely.
     
  5. DVS Matt

    DVS Matt Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    1,715
    12
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0
    fein or hohaia?

    are you taking the piss or naturally that dumb? They are both horrible half backs. They both should be playing in the no.9 jersey.

    the fact that the raiders didn't want him 3 years ago doesn't mean they don't want him now. The tigers proved 3 years ago that Withers ain't a no.7 and is being carried by J.Smith. They'd accept Mona's back with open arms.

    Roosters would pick Mona's over that hack Finch everyday of the week. If they had a better option at the club they would use it, but they don't.
     
  6. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    9,609
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    Souths COACH said they WANTED him 3 weeks ago on channel 10.

    He's the sole play maker and he's not up to that sorta pressure.
     
  7. lasvegas

    lasvegas Member

    898
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0
    only an opinion ****,talk to me with a little repect you ****in smuck
     
  8. DVS Matt

    DVS Matt Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    1,715
    12
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0
    talk to you with respect? roflmao

    Yes Sir, Sorry Sir

    give yourself a triple
     
  9. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    9,609
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    Vegas don't use the Respect your elders card with DVS. If so we will see fireworks :)
     
  10. lasvegas

    lasvegas Member

    898
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0
    sorry i was out of order i apologise.
     
  11. PJ

    PJ Well-Known Member

    2,800
    30
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0
    Apparently the cornerstones of a great team are having a great prop and a great halfback- at the moment we have neither.
    Whether Souths want him or not we are not going to win a competition with Monas at halfback- it's that simple!
     
  12. lasvegas

    lasvegas Member

    898
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0
    its obviously not pj,because a lot of punters on here think monas is this answer.
     
  13. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    Fien was such a terrible halfback when the Cowboys were on their inspired run in the finals last year, wasn't he? Oh, and he's an Origin player.

    There's two things Monaghan can't boast.

    Byso - you forgot to mention that Souths wanted Monaghan IF Manly continued to pay the bulk of his salary - it's important to note that.
     
  14. DVS Matt

    DVS Matt Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    1,715
    12
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0
    Who was playing halfback for the Cowboys for 80% of the year? It wasn't Fien. It was Sheppard, after he went down injured they put in a struggling Fien.
     
  15. PJ

    PJ Well-Known Member

    2,800
    30
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0
    I can't understand why on earth people would think that monas is the answer.
    All you have to do is watch the way Orford played against the Warriors and then ask yourself if you could see Mona's having similar like performance???
    While saying that Monas is not what we need at half, I am not saying he is useless, and maybe a place could be found for him- just not in such an important position!
     
  16. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    9,609
    83
    Ratings:
    +83 / 0
    I dont know the fine points, the point is they wanted him.

    Anyhow you dont have to convince me anymore thats he's not up to a sole playmaker role.

    A qualty 5/8 would have helped.
     
  17. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    Byso, we'd keep the fool if the Raiders offered to pay $180,000 of his annual salary too.
     
  18. KaZa

    KaZa Well-Known Member

    2,082
    164
    Ratings:
    +233 / 20
    I dont think Brisbane would mind him. Seymour was terrible yesterday and only looks half decent because of Lockyer.

    Canberra would take him.

    Bulldogs would take him at 5/8.

    Roosters would take him. Ask Gus Gould.

    Souths would.

    Its just another stupid topic. How many people would take Sutton at 5/8? Would Brisbane? No.. does that mean Sutton is a **** player?

    No logic again.
     
  19. sue ridgepipe

    sue ridgepipe Active Member

    1,310
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0
    you have finally declared yourself as the the grand wizard of abject tomfoolery my friend.that stuff above is pure unadulterated GOLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    you obviously have no respect for yourself,your family or your ancestry.take a bow.
     
  20. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    Brisbane would want him?

    :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:
     

Share This Page