1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Manly 'to support Watmough' in AVO case

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by fLIP, Apr 23, 2007.

  1. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    Manly 'to support Watmough' in AVO case

    Manly NRL club executives say they will support Anthony Watmough after his former girlfriend accused him in court of attacking her with coins and a chair, and also punching her during several violent outbursts.

    Watmough faced Sydney's Manly Local Court on Monday, where his former girlfriend of seven years Gillian Rixon is seeking an apprehended violence order.

    Ms Rixon, who has a young son with the 23-year-old Sea Eagles second-rower, told the court he violently attacked her several times, including on New Year's Eve in 2004, when he threw coins at her.

    "There was an indent in the wall - one of them hit my head and bruised it - he then threw a chair at me an it hurt me," Ms Rixon told the court.

    Watmough says he will fight the allegations, which his lawyers have deemed a "pack of lies".

    The hearing will continue in June when Watmough intends to call three witnesses.

    Meanwhile, Manly chief executive Grant Mayer said the club would support Watmough.

    "This is a domestic violence issue, the club is obviously supporting Anthony through that," Mayer said.
     
  2. Matabele

    Matabele Well-Known Member

    23,047
    447
    Ratings:
    +466 / 6
    Manly 'to support Watmough' in AVO case

    If the allegations are a pack of lies can he tack defamation action?
     
  3. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    6,779
    351
    Brisbane
    Ratings:
    +790 / 15
    Manly 'to support Watmough' in AVO case

    I would imagine so. Being in a high profile position.
     
  4. Jatz Crackers

    Jatz Crackers Moderator Staff Member

    9,128
    1,149
    Ratings:
    +1,242 / 7
    Manly 'to support Watmough' in AVO case

    Yes. As slander. But the lies would have to be proven which is highly unlikely.

    Conversely, she would clearly have defence options of either a) what she said was believed to be true or b) had the duty to disclose the information such as if making a statement to police.
     

Share This Page