1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

luke patten - video ref

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by panash, Jul 14, 2013.

  1. panash

    panash Well-Known Member

    870
    288
    Ratings:
    +296 / 0
    i dont think or is it fair he should be a video ref when scumdogs are playing..

    just before halftime ( 37th minute ) TREX hit a storm player ( to me it was a shoulder charge ) seen many of them , it went upstairs and they ruled knock on , scumdogs score in that set of 6...HUGE ADVANTAGE FOR SCUMDOGS HAVING PATTEN AS A VIDEO REF...

    i might be too biased against scumdogs , but if you see it

    shoulder charge or not ??
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Brissie Kid

    Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

    2,691
    742
    Ratings:
    +828 / 10
    Doggies pushing limit on 5th tackle. Always getting the jump on the 10m so they can get to the Storm kicker. They know referees won't ping them on the 5th tackle.
     
  3. swoop

    swoop Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    3,497
    637
    Ratings:
    +1,201 / 16
    Watch Bellamy come out and launch a tirade at the NRL for not having a stand alone weekend for SOO. I'd be in agreement with him as it gives an unfair advantage to teams who have no reps i.e the dogs are getting a huge leg up with the draw.

    Imagine if it were our team with half a dozen rep players out. How can it be a fair competition if you've got an NRL just about full strength playing virtually a reserve grade team. It sucks.
     
  4. Kiwi Eagle

    Kiwi Eagle Moderator Staff Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    14,488
    1,734
    Ratings:
    +2,425 / 31
    They only lose them all twice a year max, the rest of the comp they have the advantage of having all the guys with big match experience available to them that other sides dont have

    Looking like we will be 1 win back from the Storm with a better differential if we can get the win tomorrow night
     
  5. master blaster

    master blaster Well-Known Member

    1,769
    449
    Ratings:
    +674 / 4
    well gus almost said as much,that was def a shoulder charge
     
  6. Sheikheagle

    Sheikheagle Well-Known Member

    1,753
    315
    Ratings:
    +854 / 53
    Hodgkinson playing well for the dogs
     
  7. HappilyManly

    HappilyManly MWTS Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    14,788
    5,735
    Freshwater
    Ratings:
    +11,498 / 254
    Manly should trademark 40-0, the Dogs coukd only manage 39 :p
     
  8. Brissie Kid

    Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

    2,691
    742
    Ratings:
    +828 / 10
    Josh Reynolds again resorts to cheating but the pink officials don't bin him for it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Sheikheagle

    Sheikheagle Well-Known Member

    1,753
    315
    Ratings:
    +854 / 53
    agree almost as bad as the umps decision in the cricket the other night. What about Ennis they are winning comfortably and he hasn't stopped whining to the refs
     
  10. Brissie Kid

    Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

    2,691
    742
    Ratings:
    +828 / 10
    Obviously man of the match isn't given to the best and fairest any more.
     
  11. Eagles2nv

    Eagles2nv New Team, New Beginnings 2016 Tipping Competitor

    3,277
    754
    Ratings:
    +1,407 / 35
    As much as i hate the purple scum, i agree. No team should be disadvantaged by representative football.

    Also agree patten should not be a vid ref for scum dog games, that has to be an advantage to the dogs
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. simon64

    simon64 Well-Known Member Premium Member

    2,273
    990
    Ratings:
    +2,081 / 27
    It was 100% a shoulder charge. I thought they would at least penalise it and put him on report but......nothing. I accept it wasn't dangerous in any way but that's not the point. It was a clear cut shoulder charge.

    Secondly, Reynolds the grub should have been sin binned for his professional foul. Pure and simple. Why don't they referee them in the same way as Manly ?
     
  13. SeaEagleRock8

    SeaEagleRock8 Sea Eagle Lach Staff Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    12,593
    3,523
    Ratings:
    +6,795 / 122
    Those decisions are the reason it's unfair to give Patten a Dogs match. At least until he's built a reputation as an official after a couple of years on the job.
    Meanwhile, when it comes to impartiality, perception is everything. Why put Patten in that position?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. eagleE

    eagleE Active Member

    576
    92
    Ratings:
    +92 / 0
    The refs do not have the balls to make the calls that they are supposed to make. Disappointing.
     
  15. panash

    panash Well-Known Member

    870
    288
    Ratings:
    +296 / 0
    i know im biased and hate the scum dogs !!!!

    thats why i had to ask the question... what we have seen so far this year that should of been a penalty....

    then that scum twig leg reynolds , how that wasnt a sin bin beats me !!!

    hoping they dont make the top 8 , but for me their not a threat the only reason why they did what they did last year is they used that decoy ( sheperd ) play over and over which lead to points...

    if you match their forwards and kick down field and keep turning them around they have no strike power !!!!

    Manly 13+ tomorrow , hope we cement a top 4 spot after 26 rounds !!
     
  16. master blaster

    master blaster Well-Known Member

    1,769
    449
    Ratings:
    +674 / 4
    yeah,the good old sharp shooter hasnt been so sharp this last few weeks
     
  17. Sheikheagle

    Sheikheagle Well-Known Member

    1,753
    315
    Ratings:
    +854 / 53
    Would have been great if he kicked like that against us!
     
  18. master blaster

    master blaster Well-Known Member

    1,769
    449
    Ratings:
    +674 / 4
    lol,bloody oath Sheikheagle,lol
     
  19. jbb/james

    jbb/james Well-Known Member

    1,705
    491
    Ratings:
    +885 / 21
    To say patten shouldnt adjudicate a team insinuates he is a cheat, and thus should not ref any team. A couple of clunker decisions today for sure

    Reynolds should have been sent to the bin but honestly the ref should have called it and patten shouldnt carry the can for 2 on field refs, 2 touchies and 2 video refs
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. MissKate

    MissKate Well-Known Member Premium Member

    1,397
    360
    Ratings:
    +1,021 / 7
    But the video ref has tipped the on field refs to change decisions before on wrong calls. If he had done that then people would not be questioning his bias so much. There were some very dodgy calls in that game and they all went in the dogs favour, not a good look
     

Share This Page