Eagles2nv said:Fozza is back at training. This was posted on NRlL.com, thought you might be interested.
http://www.nrl.com/we-can-go-back-to-back-foran/tabid/10874/newsid/65657/default.aspx
I think we're going to win the comp. every year....I've been right a few times too.Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Eagles Terrorist said:I'm not sure I really like this.
In 2008 and 2011, if we're all honest, we weren't thinking "we're going to win the comp" - well, we might have hoped, but it wasn't a certainty by any means.
And Des' - we're under the radar approach - worked well in both cases.
Can't we just keep flying under the radar and let others mouth off about how they'll win the comp? Champ to chump only takes a few bad games in such a tight comp.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | 3 | 0 | 48 | 6 | |
4 | 3 | 1 | 28 | 6 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | |
4 | 2 | 2 | 39 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 4 | |
2 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | |
2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | |
3 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 4 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -5 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -15 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -22 | 2 | |
3 | 1 | 2 | -36 | 2 | |
2 | 0 | 2 | -56 | 2 | |
3 | 0 | 3 | -64 | 0 |