1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Darling Danny

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by smcgarrigle, Apr 3, 2013.

  1. smcgarrigle

    smcgarrigle New Member

    20
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 0
    I know I'm prone to go on about the Manly injustices, however last week the media around Richie Fa'aoso's shoulder charge was akin to a convicted murderer. This week of course Danny Buderus' shoulder charge goes unchallenged. It went up stairs in the game.....and nothing. Now we find out Blake Ferguson has a cracked cheek bone and be out for 8 weeks. Still Danny hasn't been sited and given a grade 4 charge to be fought out at the judiciary.
    What the hell am i missing?
     
  2. HappilyManly

    HappilyManly MWTS Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    14,788
    5,735
    Freshwater
    Ratings:
    +11,498 / 254
    The MRC got Kitey for what ?

    They are missing in action big time with this shoulder charge :mad:
     
  3. MissKate

    MissKate Well-Known Member Premium Member

    1,398
    360
    Ratings:
    +1,022 / 7
    Not missing in action just bias for and against certain players in other words - unprofessional!
     
  4. sheridanstand78

    sheridanstand78 Well-Known Member

    2,940
    1,485
    Ratings:
    +3,308 / 51
    Yeah they miss an obvious shoulder charge and now Blake Ferguson is out for 2 months. Even worse is they didnt even bother to cite that Mongrel Blair for his chicken wing tackle on our player, gosh i wonder where he learnt to do that???? Even Inu got off lightly, how does he get 5 weeks when She Rex got 7? Inus tackle was much worse.
     
  5. the mauler

    the mauler Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    2,765
    1,139
    Ratings:
    +1,653 / 25
    If Buderus was wearing a Manly jersey hed be currently on a months holiday.
     
  6. Townsville Eagle

    Townsville Eagle Active Member

    409
    171
    Ratings:
    +171 / 0
    Because they don't have to answert to anybody. If they did, they would have to be fair dinkum.

    AFL is a great sport, I am liking it more everyday. Very professional overall.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Rambo1987

    Rambo1987 Well-Known Member

    1,681
    145
    Ratings:
    +212 / 2
    I will never know how they missed that one.
     
  8. Brissie Kid

    Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

    2,691
    743
    Ratings:
    +829 / 10
    Yes because AFL doesn't even have a send off rule & has 100s of interchanges. Teams also 'tank' to lose matches. Real professional code.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. WAMF

    WAMF Well-Known Member

    3,201
    389
    Perth
    Ratings:
    +408 / 0
    Zero consistency as expected. Move along, nothing to see here.
     
  10. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,370
    3,610
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,463 / 74
    I thought this thread was going to be about me
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Jethro

    Jethro This space is for rent Staff Member Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    7,128
    1,492
    Ratings:
    +1,897 / 7
    So did I. :D
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. Frogz

    Frogz Don't mess with the goat, he has photos. Premium Member

    2,175
    647
    Sydney, Australia
    Ratings:
    +1,392 / 36
    But the referees get dropped for missing it...Missing what???

    Rules for the chosen ones
     
  13. Jonesyv2

    Jonesyv2 Active Member

    586
    56
    Ratings:
    +59 / 0
    Maybe the match review panel will be dropped for missing it?
     
  14. The Wheel

    The Wheel Well-Known Member

    10,890
    805
    Ratings:
    +1,766 / 72
    It wouldnt have had Darling in the title if it was :)
     
  15. globaleagle

    globaleagle Où est mon chapeau Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    11,785
    4,708
    Ratings:
    +7,799 / 58
    In relation to the Buderus incident, the report read that the Newcastle hooker had: ''in attempting a shoulder charge, made contact with his shoulder/upper arm to the body of Blake Ferguson. Minor clash of heads, further contact was made from the arm of [Knights forward] Neville Costigan to the head/neck of Blake Ferguson who was dropping. Could have been penalised.''

    Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/raiders-fume-despite-refs-axing-20130402-2h5ef.html#ixzz2PMA5Nr6z



    Nrl explanation.
     
  16. Brissie Kid

    Brissie Kid Well-Known Member

    2,691
    743
    Ratings:
    +829 / 10
    He played for Knights in season 1997.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Rex

    Rex Well-Known Member

    4,334
    761
    Ratings:
    +2,338 / 60
    With that official explanation, how is Buderus not cited? Attempted shoulder charge, head clash, etc. The damage done was far worse than with Fa'oso's hit. How was Fa'oso charged if Buderus isn't?

    Similarly a system that gives 7 weeks to a simple Catherine Wheel tackle where the player didn't land dangerously (T-Rex) - and 5 weeks where a player was forcefully driven down onto the point of the unprotected head (Inu). WTF?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. manlyfan76

    manlyfan76 Parra Trolls are the best. Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    8,564
    2,431
    Anywhere but Parramatta
    Ratings:
    +5,352 / 111
    I'm not defending it but trex fought charge and loss and ony took the early guilty and got discount 25%.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. DSM5

    DSM5 Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    9,997
    516
    Ratings:
    +516 / 0
    Didn't quite get the point mf76, however it is really weird that all NRL officials got it so wrong. The only conclusion one can reach is that bias does exist at NRL headquarters. (as manly fans have always known anyway).
     
  20. Kiwi Eagle

    Kiwi Eagle Moderator Staff Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

    14,488
    1,734
    Ratings:
    +2,425 / 31
    MF76 isn't talking about Buderus DSM, he is comparing the Inu and Williams tackles that were mentioned
     

Share This Page