MadMarcus link said:[quote author=MadMarcus link=topic=184322.msg278971#msg278971 date=1280185217]
What I can't understand is why the angle showing Folau dropping the ball wasn't shown until after the decision was made?
Was News Ltd owned Fox withholding footage so News Ltd owned Broncos could win? Or are my conspiracy theories getting the better of me?
Maybe there is something in my conspiracy theory?
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/fox-accepts-the-blame-for-video-ref-replay-debacle-20100727-10udi.html
On the vision provided to the video ref I think it should have been a refs call. The ref was right there.
I don't know how Finch can still say the decision was correct after seeing the angle that was shown after the decision was made. It appears obvious that the blindness starts from the top.
[/quote]
I read somewhere that Archer would have ruled a try if it came back as "Refs Call"
Correct me if I am wrong....